Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

First Amendment Rights and Corporate Speech: A Comparative Analysis of Key Cases, Quizzes of Communication and Development studies

Definitions and analyses of landmark cases that have shaped the interpretation of first amendment rights for corporations, including citizens united, first national bank of boston v. Belotti, pacific gas and electric, and virginia state board of pharmacy v. Virginia citizens consumer council. Topics covered include expenditures, contributions, commercial speech, and the central hudson four-part test.

Typology: Quizzes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 12/07/2013

louisg91
louisg91 🇺🇸

12 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download First Amendment Rights and Corporate Speech: A Comparative Analysis of Key Cases and more Quizzes Communication and Development studies in PDF only on Docsity! TERM 1 Citizens United DEFINITION 1 2010 case which overturned precedents restricting corporate funded speech about candidates TERM 2 First National Bank of Boston v. Belotti DEFINITION 2 - FNBB sued Attorney General of Mass. for infringing on 1st amendment rights by not letting them advertise against ballot propsition opposing personal income tax proposal- Has created unlimited 1st amendment freedom for nonmedia corporations to support ballot propositions- All truthful expression about matters of public concern TERM 3 Pacific Gas and Electric DEFINITION 3 - SC ruled that a California utility could not be enforced to include a newsletter from a consumer group in the company's billing envelopes TERM 4 Similarities b/t Corporations and Individuals DEFINITION 4 - Due Process - Equal protection - Not subject to double jeopardy TERM 5 Differences b/t Corporations and Individuals DEFINITION 5 - Have perpetual life- Not human- are impersonal- Establish limited liability from shareholders- NO right of privacy- NO protection against testifying against oneself- NO "fulfillment" from exercising free speech TERM 6 Expenditures DEFINITION 6 Money spent on behalf of candidates- "Direct Speech"- Constitutionally protected TERM 7 Contributions DEFINITION 7 Money given directly to a candidate or their campaign- "indirect speech"- Not constitutionally protected- Corporations cannot make direct contributions TERM 8 Va. State Board of Pharmacy v. Va. Citizens Consumer Council DEFINITION 8 Court ruled prohibiting price advertising of prescription drugs violated consumers 1st amendment rights to receive information.Case that established 1st amendment protection for "purely commercial" speech TERM 9 Rule 315 DEFINITION 9 Section in broadcasting laws- Equal opportunity rule: - Opportunity for each qualified candidate to buy as much time as others - Media not required to give equal time, only required to provide opportunity for equal time - Applies to advertising, not journalismExceptions:- Bonafide newscast- Bonafide news interview- on the spot coverage of bonafide news event (debates, press releases, etc.)- Requires ad sales at lowest unit rate- Stations not liable for defamation in candidate's ads TERM 10 Commercial Speech DEFINITION 10 - Does no more than propose a commercial transaction, related solely to the economic interests of the speaker and its audience- Purpose of commercial speech: - Well-informed aggregate purchasing decisions in a market economy allocate resources intelligently
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved