Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Utilitarianism and Euthanasia: A Consequentialist Approach to Moral Dilemmas, Study notes of Modern Philosophy

This lecture from philosophy 115 explores utilitarianism, a consequentialist ethical theory advocating for actions that maximize overall happiness. The discussion covers utilitarianism's origins, its stance on euthanasia, and the expansion of morally protected beings. Jeremy bentham and john stuart mill are key figures in this philosophical framework.

Typology: Study notes

2009/2010

Uploaded on 04/12/2010

koofers-user-43z
koofers-user-43z 🇺🇸

5

(1)

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Utilitarianism and Euthanasia: A Consequentialist Approach to Moral Dilemmas and more Study notes Modern Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity! PHL 115 Lecture 5 Utilitarianism Part 1 R&R ch. 6 1. Utilitarianism was launched by the British social reformer Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), and given its most elegant formulation by economist and philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806- 1873). It is the view that the moral course of action is whatever brings about the highest degree of net subjective happiness. It is thus a version of consequentialism, the view that the goodness of an action or policy is a function of its consequences. 2. R&R illustrate utilitarianism’s implication by reference to issues. The first of these is euthanasia, a practice that is legal under controlled conditions in a couple of jurisdictions (e.g., the Netherlands), but in most societies is illegal. Christian authorities have always been opposed to it. 3. According to utilitarians, there can be no moral objection to an action or policy unless it harms an unwilling party. A crucial normative claim on which it is based is that mentally competent adults are sovereign arbiters of their own welfare. Thus if a mentally competent adult judges that she is benefited rather than harmed by being euthanized, then the right course of action for those in a position to honor her request is to kill her.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved