Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Physics H7C Homework problem sets and solutions, Exercises of Physics

homework exercises and solutions for physics h7c

Typology: Exercises

2017/2018

Uploaded on 09/07/2018

brandontran7758
brandontran7758 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Physics H7C Homework problem sets and solutions and more Exercises Physics in PDF only on Docsity! Homework 9 Solutions May 6, 2016 1a) Multiplying the given ~z1, ~z2 vectors by the Sz matrix gives Sz~z1 = ~ 2 ( 1 0 0 −1 )( 1 0 ) = ~ 2 ( 1 0 ) = ~ 2 ~z1 (1) and Sz~z2 = ~ 2 ( 1 0 0 −1 )( 0 1 ) = ~ 2 ( 0 −1 ) = −~ 2 ~z2 (2) so we see that ~z1, ~z2 are indeed eigenvectors with respective eigenvalues sz,1 = ~/2 and sz,1 = −~/2 1b) Multiplying the given ~x1, ~x2 vectors by the Sx matrix gives Sx~x1 = ~ 2 ( 0 1 1 0 ) 1√ 2 ( 1 1 ) = ~ 2 1√ 2 ( 1 1 ) = ~ 2 ~x1 (3) and Sx~x2 = ~ 2 ( 0 1 1 0 ) 1√ 2 ( 1 −1 ) = ~ 2 1√ 2 ( −1 1 ) = −~ 2 ~z2 (4) so we see that ~z1, ~z2 are indeed eigenvectors with respective eigenvalues sz,1 = ~/2 and sx,1 = −~/2 so we see that ~x1, ~x2 are indeed eigenvectors with respective eigenvalues sx,1 = ~/2 and sx,1 = −~/2 1c) We see easily ~x1 = 1√ 2 ( 1 1 ) = 1√ 2 ( 1 0 ) + 1√ 2 ( 0 1 ) = 1√ 2 ~z1 + 1√ 2 ~z2 (5) and ~x2 = 1√ 2 ( 1 −1 ) = 1√ 2 ( 1 0 ) − 1√ 2 ( 0 1 ) = 1√ 2 ~z1 − 1√ 2 ~z2 (6) 1d) As described in the problem, if a state is written as a superposition of eigen- states like ~z = a~z1 + b~z2, then the probabilities of measuring each Sz eigenstate 1 is given by the square of the coefficients (or weight) of each eignenstate, so |a|2 and |b|2. So for the case of ~x1, we see from the above that a = b = 1/ √ 2 so the probability of measuring spin up or spin down in z are both = 1/2. 1e) If the particle is in the ~z1 state then it is in a superposition of Sx eigenstates, as we can write ~z1 = ( 1 0 ) = 1 2 ( 1 1 ) + 1 2 ( 1 −1 ) = 1√ 2 ~x1 + 1√ 2 ~x2 (7) so we see that the coefficients are a = b = 1/ √ 2 so the probability of measuring spin up or spin down in x are both = 1/2. 2a) Plugging our ansatz into the three dimensional Schrödinger’s equation, we find EX(x)Y (y)Z(z) = −~2 2m [ X ′′(x)Y (y)Z(z))+ X(x)Y ′′(y)Z(z) +X(x)Y (y)Z ′′(z) ] (8) inside the well, but we know that in the same region −~2 2m X ′′(x) = ExX(x) (9) and similarly for Y (y) and Z(z), hence EX(x)Y (y)Z(z) = (Ex + Ey + Ez)X(x)Y (y)Z(z) (10) thus the product of the solutions of one dimensional wells is a solution of the three dimensional Schrödinger’s equation with energy eigenvalue E = Ex + Ey + Ez. The wavefunction is then ψ(x, y, z) = 8√ L3 ∑ nx,ny,nz sin (nxπx L ) sin (nyπy L ) sin (nzπz L ) (11) simply the product of the individually normalized wavefunctions. 2b) Following the result in the previous part, we have E = (n2x + n 2 y + n 2 z)~2π2 2mL2 (12) 2c,d) Neglecting spin, there is 1 possible ground state (nx, ny, nz) = (1, 1, 1). There are three degenerate first excited states (2, 1, 1), (1, 2, 1), (1, 1, 2). 2
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved