Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Understanding Political Positioning's Impact on Apparel Trade - Prof. Patrick Yanez, Study notes of International Business

An overview of the politics and political positioning in international trade, with a focus on the apparel industry. It discusses the manipulation of trade relationships through 'unfair competition' laws, remedies such as countervaling duties and trade embargoes, and the role of government 'red tape' as a trade barrier. The document also explores the historical context of textile and apparel trade politics in the us, from the 1950s to the present day, and the impact of various trade arrangements and agreements on the industry.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-muv
koofers-user-muv 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Political Positioning's Impact on Apparel Trade - Prof. Patrick Yanez and more Study notes International Business in PDF only on Docsity! IN312 International Trade Professor Patrick Yanez/FIT Pat Yanez/FIT IN312 International Trade Department of International Trade & Marketing (ITM) http://www3.FITnyc.edu/ITM Chapter 6 Politics & Political Positioning Pat Yanez/FIT Politics and Apparel Trade • Political manipulation of trade relationships • “Unfair Competition” laws to protect from: – Subsidies and Price Support Programs – Production Subsidies – Dumping (“import surges”) • Remedies: countervaling duties, trade embargoes • Government “red tape” as a trade barrier • Vehicles for political positioning: – Labor unions – Trade associations Pat Yanez/FIT U.S. Textile Trade Decision-Making Source: Going Global, Kunz & Garner, 2007. Page 145 Pat Yanez/FIT Textile/Apparel (T&A) Trade Politics U.S. Textile Manufacturing U.S. Apparel Manufacturing U.S. T&A Retailing 1950’s Production mostly for domestic markets Japan becomes serious competitor 1960’s New competitors: India, Turkey, Taiwan, Hong Kong Short & Long term arrangements 1970’s New Competitors: South Korea, Mexico Multifiber Arrangement Increasing int’l buying 1980’s Trade protection with fabric forward rules Stronger MFA Int’l marketing Early sourcing 1990’s Trade protection with yarn forward rules US-Canada FTA Int’l sourcing Mostly sourcing Free trade advocate 2000’s Moving toward int’l production Seeking Freer trade Social Responsibility Mature sourcing Multinational 2010’s Free trade? Anti-Dumping? Free trade? Free trade? Mostly local sourcing Some Int’l buying Source: Adapted by P. Yanez from “Going Global”, Kunz & Garner, 2007. Page 150
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved