Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Evaluation Rubrics for Student Reports and Presentations, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Engineering

Evaluation rubrics for various types of student reports and presentations, including interim reports, final reports, ethics reports, poster papers, and student performance. The rubrics cover different aspects such as coherence, formatting, mechanics, time limits, visual aids, and engagement with the project.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/16/2009

koofers-user-02p-1
koofers-user-02p-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Evaluation Rubrics for Student Reports and Presentations and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Engineering in PDF only on Docsity! Name of Student 2. Presents background material (present knowledge in field) 3. Fits project into larger context, goals of team, mentor 2. Shows superiority of design (or method) over alternatives 2. Coherence (whole report is clear, tells coherent story) 3. Transitions (paragraphs, subheads) 4. Tables, Figures link to text 2. Units, numbers (SI symbols, significant digits, naked decimal points) 3. Appearance, formatting of Report, Figures, Tables, Equations, References Reliability, economics, safety, impact, ethics, etc. PHGN 471. Evaluation of Interim Report/Proposal Approx 6 pp. of text (single author), single spaced, 12-pt, 1-in margins, Times New Roman, plus figs, refs Exceeds ex- pectations Meets ex- pectations Needs to improve Inadequate (0-7) Introduction 1. Begins by identifying objective of project; states specifications, constraints Body 1. Describes experimental or theoretical methods, procedures in detail 3. Requests funding, shows cost estimate, provides timeline Evidence Assertions supported by reasoning, 6-12 citations (single author), formatted AIP, cited in order in text Format, organization 1. Structure (clear overall structure) Conclusion Summarizes, draws conclusions if appropriate, or argues in favor of continuing project Mechanics 1. Sentence structure (grammar, spelling, punctuation) Name of Student 2. Presents background material (present knowledge in field) 3. Fits project into larger context, goals of team, mentor 2. Shows superiority of design (or method) over alternatives 2. Coherence (whole report is clear, tells coherent story) 3. Transitions (paragraphs, subheads) 4. Tables, Figures, References link to text, cited in order 2. Units, numbers (SI symbols, significant digits, naked decimal points) 3. Appearance, formatting of Report, Figures, Tables, Equations, References Reliability, economics, safety, impact, ethics, etc. Points Grade 1. Clearly defines ethical problem 20 2. Outlines alternative solutions 20 3. Draws and supports conclusion 20 20 2. Sentence structure (grammar, spelling, punctuation) 10 10 Grade Name of grader Yes No 2. Introduces clear central idea 2. Understandable to uninformed audience 3. Provides technical details 4. Shows good organization Yes No Yes No 2. Legible from 3 m away 3. Uncluttered, outline form, no sentences, paragraphs (abstract OK) 4. Support, complement presentation 5. Understandable on own 6. Enough (not too many or too few) Yes No 2. Good diction 4. Good response to questions 2. Good eye contact 3. Competent use of visual display PHGN 472. Evaluation of Final Report Approx 6 pp. of text (single author; 9 pp. for 2 authors, etc.), single spaced, 12-pt type, 1-in margins, Times New Roman, plus figs, refs Exceeds ex- pectations Meets ex- pectations Needs to improve Inadequate (0-7) Introduction 1. Begins by identifying objective of project; states specifications, constraints Body 1. Describes experimental or theoretical methods, procedures in detail 3. Details costs, provides timeline Evidence Assertions supported by reasoning, 6-12 citations (single author), formatted AIP, cited in order in text Format, organization 1. Structure (clear overall structure) Conclusion Summarizes, draws conclusions, gives suggestions for future work Mechanics 1. Sentence structure (grammar, spelling, punctuation) PH 472. Evaluation of Ethics Report Name Content (60 %) Form (40 %) 1. Coherence (whole report is clear, tells coherent story, is well organized) 3. Formatting (title, paragraphs, references, overall appearance) PH 472. Evaluation of Poster Paper Name of student Exceeds ex- pectations Meets ex- pectations Needs to improve Inadequate (0-7) Introduction: 1. Introduces self AND project Body: 1. Supports main idea Conclusion: 1. Ties presentation together OR asks for questions Time limits: 1. Fills time effectively (3-5 min) Visual aids: 1. Clear, readable Sound: 1. Clear volume and pronunciation 3. Absence of verbal tics (um, like, y’know) Miscellaneous: 1. Good posture, attitude, appearance
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved