Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

NLRA and Dual Motive Discharge: Employer Obligations and Burden of Proof, Slides of Labour Law

The relevant provisions of the national labor relations act (nlra) regarding unfair labor practices by employers, specifically in relation to hiring and tenure, and the conflict between board and court decisions on dual motive discharges. The document also covers the shifting burden of proof in such cases, focusing on the transportation management case.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/26/2013

saighiridhar
saighiridhar 🇮🇳

4.5

(2)

42 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download NLRA and Dual Motive Discharge: Employer Obligations and Burden of Proof and more Slides Labour Law in PDF only on Docsity! Relevant Provisions of NLRA • “8(a) Unfair labor practices by employer. It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer . . . (3) by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization: . . .” • 10(c) “. . . No order of the Board shall require the reinstatement of any individual as an employee who has been suspended or discharged, or the payment to him of any back pay, if such individual was suspended or discharged for cause.” Docsity.com Dual Motive Discharge • Conflict between Board and Courts – Wright Line issued in 1980 • Cited Mt. Healthy Bd. Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 1977 – Enforced or not? • Enforced NLRB v. Wright Line, 662 F.2d 899,909 (1981) • Enforcement denied, NLRB v. Trans. Mgt., 462 U.S. 393, 400 (1983) • who bears burden of showing discharge would have occurred: GC or Er? • GC did not “give up” – Adverse Court decisions in “dual motive” cases back to 1968 and into 1970’s; violation if GC met: • “dominant motive” test (1st, 9th Circuits) • “reasonably equal” (5th Circuit) – But also “in part” test (3rd, 4th,7th, 10th Circuits) • Supreme Court took 15 years to resolve dispute – waits for “ripeness” Docsity.com Elements General Counsel Must Show • 1. Activity that is protected by Act • 2. Employer aware of protected activity. • 3. Adverse employment action suffered by ee(s) • 4. A link between adverse employment action and protected activity – Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083, 1980, efd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir., 1981), cert. Den. 455 U.S. 989, see also Manno Electric, 321 NLRB 278, 280 at fn 12 (1996) Docsity.com Application to Trans. Management • General Counsel Elements of Burden – 1. Activity that is protected by Act • Santillo attempting to organize drivers – 2. Employer aware of protected activity. • Supervisor statements to Santillo (“two-faced,” “get even”) – 3. Adverse employment action suffered by ee(s) • Discharge – 4. link between adverse employment action and protected activity • Proximity in time between supervisor statement and discharge • Employer: Occurred in any event? – Keys in bus a common occurrence – Decision made before superv. aware of keys – No customary warnings on breaks Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved