Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Research about concept paper, Summaries of Research Methods for Managers

Research concept paper about psychology.

Typology: Summaries

2023/2024

Uploaded on 05/23/2024

unknown user
unknown user 🇵🇭

Partial preview of the text

Download Research about concept paper and more Summaries Research Methods for Managers in PDF only on Docsity! 1 BULACAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PHILOSOPHY Psychology Department Psy 308: Field Methods CONCEPT PAPER PROPOSED RESEARCH TITLE: “The Lived Experiences of Mental Health Professionals at Public Health Centers in the Philippines: A Phenomenological Study” BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY: Nowadays, conversations about mental health are more openly accepted and normalized than ever before. Everytime the idea of mental health is discussed, it is common to consider the perspectives and expertise of affiliated mental health professionals. Mental health professionals are defined as individuals who have undergone education and specialized training to offer mental health services in order to identify and treat mental health conditions, which includes registered psychiatrists, registered psychologists, registered psychometricians, psychiatric mental health nurses, licensed clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors, and registered therapists (Mayo Clinic, 2023). These mental health professionals dedicate their careers to supporting, guiding, and helping individuals manage and navigate their mental and emotional well-being. The essential role of mental health professionals in helping individuals who are battling with their mental health is very evident. However, it is also important to recognize that they, too, face challenges in their profession that put their well-being at risk. The most frequent difficulties faced by mental health professionals are mental, emotional, and financial concerns which specifically include: burnout and stress; being vulnerable to trauma resulting from empathetic client involvement; and financial risks arising from the lack of funding of the government for mental health services. These challenges, in turn, can possibly influence their ability to provide effective care and support to clients (Kar et al., 2022; Alibudbud, 2023; APA, 2024). In addition to this, some studies claim that mental health professionals in public health centers faced more difficulties and distress due to a combination of several factors. One of these is the large numbers of patients seeking care due to the high prevalence of mental disorders and poor socio-economic conditions, which places tremendous pressure on the existing public mental health centers (Docrat et al., 2019, as cited by Bezuidenhout, 2020). Another factor that contributes to their difficulties is the increased workload, 2 along with challenging working conditions, which in turn results in overstraining the workers (Sobekwa & Arunachallam, 2015). Additionally, public health centers have limited government funding (Bantjes et al., 2016, as cited by Bezuidenhout, 2020). These problems may serve as the reason behind the decision of most psychologists to opt for private practices for better salaries and working conditions (Bezuidenhout, 2020, as cited by Bezuidenhout, 2020). Given that a considerable portion of the related literature on the lived experiences of mental health professionals is primarily conducted in other countries, it is crucial to direct our attention towards the specific context of mental health professionals working in public health centers in the Philippine context. In line with this statement, the study conducted by Lally et al. (2019) stated that there is a lack of mental health centers in the Philippines, and the few existing mental health centers continue to face challenges, including underinvestment, a lack of mental health professionals, underdeveloped community mental health services, overcrowding, poorly functioning units, chronic staff shortages, and funding constraints, which are still considered ongoing problems, particularly in peripheral facilities. As of the latest available data on those who are working in public health centers in the Philippines, there is an estimated total of 548 psychiatrists, 516 psychiatric nurses, and 133 psychologists in the Philippines, which can all result in only 3 mental health professionals per more than 100,000 population (World Health Organization, 2020). Because of the insufficient number of mental health professionals in our country, most of them work for private services and are mainly based in urban areas, particularly in Manila, which results in a lack of mental health professionals in other work settings, including public health centers and rural areas. Moreover, the shortage of mental health professionals in the Philippines is also a significant challenge that hinders the delivery of mental health services across the country. In connection with this, the same study by Lally et al. (2019) stated that the ratio of mental health professionals per population in the Philippines is low. They mentioned that this is lower when compared to Western countries having the same economic status, such as Malaysia. Therefore, this corresponds to an extreme lack of mental health professionals in the Philippines. In recent years, there has been a growing body of literature dedicated to understanding and exploring the lived experiences of mental health professionals working in health centers. Some studies have delved into the intricacies of their roles, the challenges they face, and the coping strategies they employ while working in such systems. In some studies, they are immersed in exploring the challenges that mental health professionals might encounter. For instance, in a study by Jamil and Baseer (2023), findings showed that one of the main challenges that mental health professionals are constantly dealing 5 Research Design and Paradigm The researchers will follow a social constructivist perspective. As explained by Creswell (2013), individuals in this paradigm seek to understand the world using a subjective lens or in a manner that is based on their own experiences. The researchers will also employ a qualitative approach, specifically a phenomenological research design, which will help to explore the lived experiences of mental health professionals at public health centers in the Philippines. Phenomenology acknowledges the reality and truth of phenomena and highlights that individual experiences have their own meaning that could be attributed to the phenomenon under study (Ardiana, 2023). Sampling Plan and Sample Size The researchers will utilize a purposive sampling technique. This technique will enable the researchers to select respondents who exhibit specific characteristics or phenomena necessary for this study (Crossman, 2020). The researchers will look for public health centers through the use of social media platforms to contact possible participants who meet the given criteria. A total of five (5) mental health professionals, such as registered psychiatrists, registered psychologists, registered psychometricians, psychiatric mental health nurses, registered therapists, licensed clinical social workers, and licensed professional counselors in public health centers in the Philippines, will be the participants in this study. Participants The study is open to mental health professionals (licensed clinical social workers, registered psychiatrists, psychiatric mental health nurses, registered psychometricians, registered psychologists, licensed professional counselors, and registered therapists) currently working in a public health center in the Philippines with at least 2 years of service. On the other hand, those in private health centers or with less than 2 years of service in public health centers are not eligible for inclusion. Data Gathering Individuals who meet the selection criteria will first be briefed about the study through an informed consent form. This will include details about the study that are necessary for participants to be informed. Furthermore, a semi-structured interview guide was constructed to collect data from the participants. All interviews will be done individually and will last between 20 and 30 minutes, through online meeting platforms. The data to be collected will be kept in a password-protected file on the digital device of researchers to ensure security. METHODS: 6 Data Analysis The researchers will utilize thematic analysis to generate results from the transcribed interviews. Thematic analysis is a commonly used method in qualitative studies to systematically identify, analyze, and interpret the meaning of the collected data, which will lead to the development of themes (Kiger & Varpio, 2020). Thematic analysis involves a structured process comprising six (6) essential steps. Initially, the researchers will immerse themselves in the data, engaging in familiarizing themselves to gain deeper insights with each iteration. The next step involves generating codes, wherein the researchers will identify various topics and apply them to relevant parts of the data. Afterwards, these codes will be organized into broader themes, with the use of tables, mind maps, or theme piles to group related topics. This phase culminates in identifying or generating themes and sub-themes. Following this, the identified themes will undergo a rigorous review process, wherein researchers will assess whether the data adequately supports them and adjustments may be made, such as renaming themes or relegating them to sub-theme status within a broader construct, if needed. The subsequent phase involves refining the names of themes to ensure conceptual coherence and clarity. Finally, producing the report entails narrating the nuanced story of the themes, initially describing the meaning within each theme with illustrative examples, and potentially exploring connections between them (Braune & Clarke, 2006, as cited in the study of Mihas, 2023). Interview Protocol “The Lived Experiences of Mental Health Professionals at Public Health Centers in the Philippines: A Phenomenological Study” Time of Interview: Date: Place: Interviewer: Interviewee: The purpose of this qualitative phenomenological study is to explore the lived experiences of mental health professionals at public health centers in the Philippines. Mental health professionals (registered psychiatrists, registered psychologists, registered psychometricians, psychiatric mental health nurses, licensed clinical social workers, licensed professional counselors, and registered therapists) currently working in a public health center in the Philippines with at least 2 years of service are eligible to take part as participants in this study. To ensure confidentiality, all personal information provided during the research study will be kept strictly confidential and will only be accessible to the authorized members involved in the research process. The interview will be conducted individually and is expected to last for at least 20 to 30 minutes. You can also read the informed consent that we sent, and by signing there, you are confirming your willingness to participate and to be involved in the research process. With this, we humbly request permission to take an audio recording to accurately capture and document the details of our discussion. Questions: A. Can you tell me the following information about yourself? Name: Age: Gender:  Mental Health Professional Title: Years of Working in a Public Health Center: Department: 7 counselors and therapists. International Conference on Public Health and Well- being. https://doi.org/10.32789/publichealth.2022.1007 Jamil, Z., & Baseer, A. (2023). The lived experiences of burnout in clinical psychologists in Pakistan: A phenomenological study. NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 1– 30. https://doi.org/10.51732/njssh.v9i2.175 Kar, S. K., Shankar, A., & Singh, A. (2022). Mental health problems among mental health professionals: A neglected issue. International Journal of Advanced Medical & Health Research, 9(1), 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_67_22 Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: Amee guide no. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030 Lally, J., Tully, J., & Samaniego, R. M. (2019). Mental health services in the Philippines. BJPsych International, 16(03), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2018.34 Mental health providers: Tips on finding one. (2023, April 14). Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/mental-illness/in-depth/mental-health- providers/art-20045530?fbclid Naneishvili, G., Sikharulidze, G., & Kentchadze, V. (2015). Comparison between outpatients of private and public psychiatric hospitals in Georgia. European Psychiatry, 30, 1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(15)31487-5 Quartiroli, A., Wagstaff, C., Zakrajsek, R. A., Knight, S. M., & Etzel, E. F. (2021). The role of self- care and professional quality of life in sustaining a long-lasting career in sport psychology: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(6), 1334– 1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2021.1907483 Sciberras, A., & Pilkington, L. (2018). The lived experience of psychologists working in mental health services: An exhausting and exasperating journey. Professional Psychology: Research 10 and Practice, 49(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000184 Thompson, I. A., Amatea, E. S., & Thompson, E. A. (2014). Personal and contextual predictors of mental health counselors’ compassion fatigue and burnout. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 36(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.36.1.p61m73373m4617r3 World Health Organization. (2020). Philippines WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health Situational Assessment. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/mental-health/special-initiative/who- special-initiative-country-report---philippines---2020.pdf? sfvrsn=4b4ec2ee_8&fbclid=IwAR0IWMFtXSF3oak3XUP8Gnp8ZcgJuBTfv0gmBmPAISlTnW slbs9Osg42KqU Submitted by: Course/Year/Section: BSP-3C Group: #1 Leader: Malubay, Ma. Andrea M. Members: Ardo, Jozel D.C. Cababan, Hazel Jean R. Carballo, Ma. Francheska S. Lacdao, Eugene T. Mamaril, Ira Mikaella, P. Rueda, Betty Mae J. Torres, Ran Dave C. Torres, Tristen Francesca D. 11
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved