Rethinking Recycling: Why Reusing Needs to Be User Friendly, Essays (university) of English Literature

Download Rethinking Recycling: Why Reusing Needs to Be User Friendly and more Essays (university) English Literature in PDF only on Docsity! 1 Rethinking Recycling: Why Reusing Needs to Be User Friendly E. Hanna Department of English, Oregon State University English 101: English Composition Dr. Joseph Williams March 13, 2020 2 Rethinking Recycling: Why Reusing Needs to Be User Friendly Many people hold on to the belief that recycling is unnecessary, and even among those who believe in reducing waste, some find recycling to be inconvenient. Facilities do not always exist to handle certain materials (such as packaging and batteries), and some towns require residents to go through elaborate sorting processes or transport their recycling to a central location, all of which can seem like extra tasks in a busy world. But recycling is becoming increasingly important. According to Zellar (2008), in an article for National Geographic entitled “Recycling: The Big Picture,” “Every shrink-wrapped toy or tool or medical device we buy bears the stamp of its energy-intensive history . . .. A product’s true cost includes greenhouse gases emitted in its creation as well as use, and pollutants that cause acid rain, smog, and fouled waterways” (para. 4). Essentially, recycling is necessary because of the amount of resources and energy required to produce new items from scratch. Furthermore, landfills have become too large to accommodate in some areas, and they emit unwanted gases that damage the environment (Kaufman, 2009). Because of the repercussions of wastefulness, recycling is essential. Thus, it should be universally available and streamlined for maximum benefits. At Oregon State University, the administration, faculty, and students are used to seeing and using recycling containers to pitch water bottles, surplus paper from printers, and cardboard (Oregon State University, 2014). However, the administration does not systematically implement the recycling services on campus, creating misunderstanding about what can be recycled and where. The types of bins and services available vary by building and department, making it hard for those who live, work, and study on campus to make the most efficient recycling choices. For example, the residence halls have commingled recycling that accommodates some plastic, metal, cartons, and paper, whereas the library has different bins for paper or bottles and cans only. This Commented [A1]: In her introduction, the writer introduces the problem and, here, begins hinting at a thesis that will follow in the next paragraph. In her introduction, she describes the importance of recycling and makes it clear that the process needs to be easier. 5 help cover the costs of recycling” (para. 14), certain materials that are expensive or difficult to recycle. This approach has the benefit of lowering recycling costs for consumers, along with the bonus of discouraging companies from creating and distributing products that are bad for the environment. Oregon State could, then, ask the city of Corvallis to consider such a measure. According to sources cited by Kaufman (2009), large institutions have the most potential for affecting change in how waste and recycling are handled because they produce more waste and, thus, have the ability to change demand for certain products and services. She continued, “[C]ustomers will have to be taught to think about the destination of every throwaway if the zero-waste philosophy is to prevail, environmental officials say” (para. 27). As home base to thousands of employees and students, Oregon State University has the privilege of being an institution that can make a positive impact through education about and implementation of a comprehensive, user-friendly recycling system. If you see the need for this change to occur, contact your administrative officials in Business Affairs and tell them you want to see improved recycling efforts on your campus! Commented [A8]: The writer concludes her essay by emphasizing her proposal and leaving her audience with a call to action. 6 References Kaufman, L. (2009, October 19). Nudging recycling from less waste to none. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/science/earth/20trash.html Oregon State University. (2014). Recycling FAQ. http://fa.oregonstate.edu/recycling/about- us/recycling-faq University of Maryland. (2010). Recycling, composting, and waste reduction. http://www.sustainability.umd.edu/content/campus/recycling.php#SingleStream Zellar, Jr., T. (2008). Recycling: The big picture. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/education/big-picture/