Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Role of Rhetoric, Imagination & Power in Political Leadership: A Case Study, Exercises of Rhetoric

Public PolicyPolitical TheoryLeadership and Management

The importance of rhetoric, imagination, and power in political leadership through the lens of Paul Keating's political career. The author, Noel Pearson, argues that these three elements are essential for effective governance and policy-making. The document also discusses the influence of Aristotle's Second Road and the liberal arts of rhetoric and poetry on Keating's leadership style.

What you will learn

  • What is Aristotle's Second Road and how did it influence Keating's leadership style?
  • What are some examples of Keating's unique leadership style, drawing from the text?
  • How can the insights from this case study be applied to contemporary political leadership?
  • How did Paul Keating use rhetoric, imagination, and power to shape his political career?
  • How did Keating's love of human artistry contribute to his policy imagination?

Typology: Exercises

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/05/2022

gavin_99
gavin_99 🇦🇺

4.3

(67)

1K documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download The Role of Rhetoric, Imagination & Power in Political Leadership: A Case Study and more Exercises Rhetoric in PDF only on Docsity! RHETORIC, IMAGINATION, POWER Remarks at the launch of Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader by Troy Bramston (Scribe, 2016) Gilbert & Tobin Barangaroo 21 November 2016 Noel Pearson ‘Whoever knows and uses everything by which the advantage of a State is secured and developed, is the man to be deemed the helmsman of the State, and the originator of national policy.’1 So said Cicero. Rhetoric. Imagination. Power. Vision is their sum. Only when three are present can one speak of vision. All else is empty. It is idle to lament the dearth of vision in leaders lacking these. Power alone cannot deliver vision: too numerous are those possessing power and no skerrick of vision. Imagination without power is impotence: our bathtub vistas may well be grand, but can we take Austerlitz?                                                                                                               1 Cicero, De Oratore, Bk 1, xlviii. Rhetoric without imagination is mere cosmetic linguistics and verbal pyro- technique, absent power of moral argument. No Australian politician brought these three together like the subject of this biography. Rhetoric. Imagination. Power. Let me briefly touch each in turn. Rhetoric Rhetoric fell into decline with the rise of reason over the course of the past half millennia in the west. Its classical importance waned and today we harbour some suspicion something that was an art of wisdom is merely a tool of manipulation. But rhetoric, properly comprehended, is a noble art, not just of language, but of thought, dialogue, argument and invention. It is not merely a cosmetic art of persuasion but an architecture to guide how people think, reason and develop claims to truth.2 The erstwhile leader might best seek counsel, not from the pollster or focus group, but from this country’s most astute teacher of rhetoric as the architectonic of thought, Tony Golsby-Smith3. Golsby-Smith’s great intellectual breakthrough was his rediscovery of Aristotle’s Second Road: the alternative to the First Road of knowledge based on analytics and reason, to a Second Road of dialogue, conversation, intuition and the wisdom of crowds.                                                                                                               2 Golsby-Smith, T. (2001). Pursuing the Art of Strategic Conversations: An Investigation of the role of the liberal arts of rhetoric and poetry in the business world. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3 See www.secondroad.com.au Singular is the politician for whom the charge of treachery can not be sustained. Indeed his lion’s courage and visceral partisanship gave him a fierce loyalty that was probably his greatest vulnerability. He refused to throw Carmen under the bus. He held on to Richardson too long. As long as he drew breath for the fight, retreat was not his ken. Whatever one thinks of the besieged head of the Human Rights Commission, Keating would never abandon Triggs – or indeed Assange – to suffer alone. I think he stood by my mob too long for his own good. His opponents sought to cast us as a black albatross around his electoral throat6, but his advocacy for reconciliation and Mabo never wavered. Because it was the right thing for the nation. Coleridge defined prose as – words in their best order – and poetry – the best words in their best order. My definition is that rhetoric is poetic argument in prose form. It shares with poetry a basic awe of words and language, and employs them to make argument in prose. Words are to be hammered and shaped on the anvils, they must be played in the mouth and the throat, they can be stretched and bent, spun, curved, turned and occasionally, reinvented. And the phrases they form, and the images they conjure, must pay homage to their great power and possibility – and cliché, formulae, cant and jargon must be abjured. There is for me one rule: never underestimate the intelligence of the audience, and the willingness of people from all walks of life to learn and appreciate words well used. We all seek edification, so why should we have low expectations of our fellow citizens? In the employ of politics rhetoric is often a reverse process … of hammering ploughshares into swords … in the sweltering hot forge of political combat.                                                                                                               6 Noel Pearson, Up from the Mission, Black Inc, 2011, see pp.61-67 This one was all about putting his enemies’ baleful ideas to the sword, which of necessity meant putting the person to their demise. Who really wished for Hewson to die an early death in our country’s political service, except that his corpse was necessary to put paid to his ideas? Imagination Ideas are the ballast of political leadership. When they are thin and tepid, conventional borrowings of the policy wonks, you end up with ‘Cash for Clunkers’, a board for ‘Social Inclusion’, ‘Pink Batts’ and so on. Keating’s distinction was his imagination, from whence flowed his creativity. He remains in his 70s one of the most fecund policy brains in the country. His insights are sharper and ideas keener than the dross served up by those who came after. The great killer of imagination is transactional politics masquerading as leadership in government. Sure industrial skill in making deals are part of a useful toolbox, but it cannot be the main. Leadership cannot be an endless series of transactions: instead they must serve higher purpose and higher strategy. Pursuit of higher vision. This creativity is to be found down the Second Road. It is not just a product of the analytics and rationalism of the First. It is a product of empathy, intuition, memory and imagination. It is nurtured by human art, religion, philosophy, music, poetry and fictional writing. It is indisputable that Keating’s great fund of creativity was not just a function of his capacious intelligence, but sprung from the deep wells of a carefully curated love of human artistry. Which is why the wonks fed on a stringent diet of non-fiction policy will never emulate Keating’s policy imagination. There is more to gain from John Milton and Franz Liszt than the latest wonkery. Power The benchmark for power biography is Robert Caro’s eventually five-part opus on Lyndon Baines Johnson7. Troy Bramston chose the only subject born in these Antipodes large enough, and has produced a compelling biographical synthesis worthy of Caro. Both journalists, Caro and Bramston seek to come to grips with power, its purpose, its accumulation, its deployment, its triumph and ultimately, its loss. Caro is on my mind because there are two American presidents with whom Prime Minister Keating is best compared: LBJ and William Jefferson Clinton. These are to my mind the most prodigious political talents of the twentieth century presidents. There were greater presidents, but none with their sheer capacity. LBJ was the wiliest and most persuasive: Keating shared his ‘grab you by the lapels’ ability to cajole, persuade, charm and strike the fear of God. He thought ten moves ahead, and while attending the transactions always had a long game in play. The Texan lacked style and charisma, but no one mastered the Senate                                                                                                               7 Caro, R. A. (1988). The path to power: The years of Lyndon Johnson. New York: Vintage Books, 1983, c1982-. Caro, R. A. (2003). Means of ascent: The years of Lyndon Johnson, volume 2. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Caro, R. A. (2002). Master of the senate: The years of Lyndon Johnson, Vol.3: The years of Lyndon Johnson Culture. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Caro, R. A. (2013). The passage of power: The years of Lyndon Johnson, volume 4. New York: Vintage books, As for erstwhile leaders hatching vain empires of reform from outside of the structures of power – like me – we learn late from Machiavelli a consequent truth: Hence it is that all armed prophets have conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed.12 And thus our most promising reforms are wrecked by ignorant ministers and malign bureaucrats, be they Labor or its opponents. Provincial apparatchiks with power and no imagination. Aided and abetted by the media, not the least the country’s miserable, racist national broadcaster: a spittoon’s worth of perverse people willing the wretched to fail. They need black children to remain aliened from mothers’ bosoms, incarcerated in legions, leading short lives of grief and tribulation – because if it were not so, against whom could they direct their soft bigotry of low expectations? About whom could they report of misery and bleeding tragedy? Between Quadrant’s hard bigotry of prejudice from the right and the ABC’s soft bigotry of low expectations on the left, lies the common ground of mutual racism. The Scylla and Charibdes of the black burden in this country. I have learned one thing. Keating was a prophet. And he came out of the desert fully armed. It follows my comparison with Johnson and Clinton that if the Americans count at least a half dozen in their highest pantheon – and were it up to me the case for LBJ would be vigorous indeed – here we have our one leader of world class, whose prime ministership made compelling case, but in the larger sweep of his Hamiltonian treasurer-ship, the case becomes irrefutable.                                                                                                               12 Machiavelli, N. (1988). Machiavelli: The Prince. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Love Rhetoric. Imagination. Power. And the greatest of these is love. Of the country. And of the people. Of its ancient peoples and those who so newly called this great land their home. There were three defining moments of our long history on this continent: Firstly, the crossing of the First Australians over the Torres Strait land bridge to this continent, more than 50,000 years ago. This is the story of the world’s oldest civilization established in this country. Secondly, the arrival of the First Fleet, which brought the heritage of Britain to these shores for worse and for better. This is the story of our British inheritance. Thirdly, the abolition of the White Australia Policy by the 1970s. This is the story of Australia's multicultural triumph. Our nation is in three parts: our Indigenous heritage, etched into the land and seascapes of the country, for all Australians to discover and cherish. There is our treasured British inheritance: the institutions and system of government inherited from Britain. And our multicultural achievement: the richness of cultures from around the world whose gifts we all share. I believe a future national agenda for indigenous affairs must focus on three aspirations. First it must focus on recognition. We must appropriately reform the constitutional rule book of our nation so that it treats indigenous peoples more fairly, and ensures them a voice in laws and policies made by the parliamentary majority about our distinct rights. Second it must focus on empowerment: there must be structural reform to enable a relationship of mutual rights and responsibilities with government, and to enable indigenous peoples to take empowered responsibility in our affairs. Third it must foster cultural embrace. For the ancient indigenous heritage of this land is the rightful inheritance of all Australians. It should be known and enjoyed by all. Indigenous Australian cultures and languages should be officially embraced as Australian cultures and languages. The vision of Barangaroo developed by the subject of this biography can be the country’s greatest cultural amplifier, a gift to the nation and a promise to our future. But we can’t pith helmet this vision. The Indigenes must play a 21st century role in this vision: we have to do as well if not better than the New Zealanders. We do this and we will create a more complete Commonwealth.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved