Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Infringement of Copyright in Computer Software: A Legal Analysis, Slides of Law

An in-depth analysis of the infringement of copyright in computer software. It covers various legal cases, such as herbert rosenthal v. Kalpakian, nichols v. Universal pictures, and sheldon v. Mgm, which have shaped the understanding of copyright law in the context of computer software. The document also discusses the merger doctrine, the idea/expression dichotomy, and the role of the national commission on new technological uses of copyrighted works (contu) in defining computer programs under copyright law. It further explores the concept of non-literal copying and its economic and jurisprudential implications.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/26/2013

sajeev
sajeev 🇮🇳

3.5

(2)

48 documents

1 / 21

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Infringement of Copyright in Computer Software: A Legal Analysis and more Slides Law in PDF only on Docsity! GOALS FOR THIS CLASS • To learn more about infringement of the right of reproduction Docsity.com WRAP-UP POINTS: INFRINGEMENT • To sustain an action for infringement, copyright owner must prove • 1. Ownership of valid copyright • 2. Copying by D • 3. Unlawful Appropriation by D Docsity.com HERBERT ROSENTHAL v. KALPAKIAN (9th Cir. 1971) Docsity.com MERGER DOCTRINE • Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Kalpakian (2d Cir. 1971) • What is the merger doctrine? • What is its relationship to infringement? • How did it apply in this case? Docsity.com NICHOLS v. UNIVERSAL PICTURES (2d Cir. 1930) • Did the film “The Cohens and the Kellys” infringe the play “Abie’s Irish Rose”? • NB. Character test Docsity.com “TOTAL CONCEPT AND FEEL” • What is meant by this? See Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. Docsity.com COMPUTER SOFTWARE • To what extent is computer software protectable under copyright law? Docsity.com COPYRIGHTABILITY OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE • Computer software, by its nature as written work intended to serve utilitarian purposes, doesn’t fit in well with our existing IP system. • In 1974 Congress established National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) to study implications of new technologies and recommend revisions to IP law. Docsity.com EARLY CASES IN 1980s • Conflict between hardware manufacturers • Focus on to what extent literal copying of computer software violates copyright law • Apple v. Franklin (3d Cir. 1983) clearly establishes that an operating system is copyrightable and that exact copying of computer code infringes programmer’s copyright in the code. • No cases since have held otherwise Docsity.com SECOND GENERATION SOFTWARE CASES • To what extent can competitors copy nonliteral elements, such as program’s underlying structure, sequence, or organization. • How far does copyright protection extent beyond the literal elements of a work? Docsity.com NON-LITERAL COPYING • Should non-literal copying of computer software be protected under copyright law? • What are the economic arguments in favor and against this? • What about the jurisprudential arguments? Docsity.com Computer Associates Int’l v. Altai, Inc. (2d Cir. 1992) • Was there access? • Did the Court follow Whelan? Why or why not? Docsity.com Computer Associates Int’l v. Altai, Inc. (2d Cir. 1992) • What was the correct test for nonliteral copying of computer software? • Is this a good test? • Should we follow it for novels? • Does it adequately reflect the fact that copyright protection exists for selection and arrangement? • How would the Whelan case have come out if the Altai approach was applied? Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved