Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Interview Rating Guides and Samples for Evaluating Applicant Responses, Exams of History

Human Resources ManagementOrganizational BehaviorPersonnel PsychologyRecruiting and Staffing

Templates and samples for standardizing the evaluation of applicant interview responses. It includes sections for assessing knowledge base, work history, interpersonal skills, professional ethics, and overall rating. Questions are included for various job requirements such as leadership, project management, communication, and teamwork.

What you will learn

  • How can the interpersonal skills section of the rating sheet be used to assess an applicant's fit for a position?
  • How would you evaluate an applicant's knowledge base based on the provided rating sheet?
  • What factors should be considered when evaluating an applicant's work history using the rating sheet?

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

journalyyy
journalyyy 🇬🇧

4.6

(11)

81 documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Interview Rating Guides and Samples for Evaluating Applicant Responses and more Exams History in PDF only on Docsity! Sample Rating Guides for Evaluating Applicant Interview Responses This document contains several templates that can be used as models for standardizing your evaluation of interview results. Intentionally Left Blank _________ POSITION INTERVIEWER’S REPORT Applicant’s Name_______________________________________ Interviewer_____________________________________________ Date___________________ First Interview Second Interview Knowledge Base Considerations Relevance of Education & Training Motivation & Interest Versatility Ability & Willingness to learn Excellent Good Acceptable Not Acceptable Work History* Considerations Relevance of Experience Adaptability Initiative Leadership Work Ethic Motivation Commitment *”Work” may include volunteer or community activities. Excellent Good Acceptable Not Acceptable General Impressions Considerations Demeanor Confidence Responsiveness Verbal Expression Maturity Judgment Goals Excellent Good Acceptable Not Acceptable OVER Sample Interview Rating Sheet Author: Gail Rushford This was for an IT position Candidate: Interviewer: Job requirement: Ability to provide leadership and strategic direction. 1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Superior Not able to articulate the relationship between the IT infrastructure and organizational goals; Lack of awareness of change management strategies to gain buy-in from multiple stakeholders and change behaviors related to use of IT; Unable to describe a strategic planning process to guide long range plans, policies and programs. Effectively articulates the relationship between the IT infrastructure and organizational goals; Has experience in strategic planning to set vision, goals, and objectives for a complex system; Demonstrates an understanding of the management practices needed to guide staff, partners, and stakeholders through implementation of a strategic IT plan. In addition to meeting the satisfactory criteria, provides examples of past successes in applying leadership skills and implementing major change initiatives in a complex IT/business environment; Articulates a clear and effective vision for the IT future of AHS. Comments: Job Requirement: Ability to manage complex, multi-stakeholder projects within budget and time parameters. 1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Superior No supervisory experience; Lack of successful Project Management experience; Unable to describe a process for defining and managing a complex project. Has experience in managing projects with up to a dozen staff; Demonstrates the ability to implement projects on time and within budget. Has experience in managing large, complex projects affecting hundreds of staff; Able to maintain progress and make appropriate changes to adjust to unforeseen opportunities or threats. Comments: Sample Interview Rating Form date Job Requirement: Ability to communicate effectively. 1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Superior Appears to be ill at ease; Responses are vague or unpersuasive; Overall impression is poor. Seems comfortable in presenting his/her ideas; Responses are specific and well articulated; Overall impression is positive. Supports statements with examples; Relates to the issues and concerns of the “audience”; Shows the ability to listen well and discern one’s meaning. Comments: Job Requirement: Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships internally and across organizations. 1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Superior Demonstrates a lack of regard for the needs of staff; partners, and stakeholders; Relies on “power plays” to get results. Espouses a “win-win” approach to supervision and other relationships; advocates a collaborative approach to decision- making; demonstrates effectiveness in maintaining the trust and confidence of key stakeholders and partners. In addition to meeting the satisfactory criteria, demonstrates political acumen in planning and decision making; Provides examples of achieving results while preserving relationships. Comments: Technical Expertise –Note whether the candidate demonstrates management experience in the following areas: Application Development using:  Java  .Net  Cold Fusion Database Administration  MS-SQL  Oracle  Adabas  MySQL  Postgress  DB2  Other  Data Warehousing  Desktop workstation support  Network Infrastructure planning, deployment and support  Security (including HIPPA)  Policy & Procedure development and implementation Web Development  508 accessibility standards  WCAG 1.0  Content management Other: Interview: Candidate Evaluation Form #2 SHRM, 8/29/2014 Interviewer ____________________ Date ______________________ Candidate Name ____________________ Position ______________________ Scoring Candidate evaluation forms are to be completed by the interviewer to rank the candidate’s overall qualifications for the position to which they have applied. Under each heading the interviewer should give the candidate a numerical rating and write specific job related comments in the space provided. The numerical rating system is based on the following. 1 – Unsatisfactory 2 – Satisfactory 3 – Average 4 - Above Average 5 - Exceptional Educational Background - Does the candidate have the appropriate educational qualifications or training for this position? Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 Comments: Prior Work Experience - Has the candidate acquired similar skills or qualifications through past work experiences? Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 Comments: Technical Qualifications/Experience - Does the candidate have the technical skills necessary for this position? Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 Comments:
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved