Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Disability Discrimination Case: Jamie Larose v. Company XYZ, Schemes and Mind Maps of Human Rights

Disability LawAccessibility LawCanadian Human Rights ActDiscrimination Law

A complaint filed with the canadian human rights tribunal by jamie larose against company xyz for disability discrimination. The complainant, who uses a wheelchair, was denied access to the company's services due to the lack of wheelchair access to their office building. The facts of the case, legal issues, and remedies sought by the complainant. The remedies include ordering the company to install a wheelchair ramp and compensating the complainant for the cost of alternative services and pain and suffering.

What you will learn

  • What is the nature of the complaint filed against Company XYZ?
  • Why was the complainant denied access to Company XYZ's services?
  • What remedies is the complainant seeking from the Tribunal?

Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

margoth
margoth 🇬🇧

4.4

(11)

12 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Disability Discrimination Case: Jamie Larose v. Company XYZ and more Schemes and Mind Maps Human Rights in PDF only on Docsity! Sample Statement of Particulars Sample: Complainant (Jamie Larose v. Company XYZ) Tribunal File No.: T1234/5678 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: Jamie Larose Complainant and CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Commission and COMPANY XYZ Respondent STATEMENT OF PARTICULARS OF THE COMPLAINANT Facts 1. I am paralyzed from the waist down and get around through the use of a wheelchair. 2. On January 2, 2012, I visited the Respondent’s offices to receive the services they offer. 3. Upon arrival at the Respondent’s office building, I discovered that there is a flight of stairs that impede my access to the building. 4. There is no wheelchair ramp or other way for me to access the Respondent’s office building. 5. On January 3, 2012, I called the Respondent to see how I might be able to access their services, considering I could not access their office building. A Customer Service Representative told me that Company XYZ’s services could only be accessed in person at their office building. As a result, I was told that Company XYZ could not provide me with the services I requested. Legal Issues 6. I allege that the Respondent discriminated against me based on my disability, under section 5 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (the Act), by denying me the services it offers. 7. Company XYZ offers their services to the general public. However, because their services can only be accessed in person, and because their office building does not provide for wheelchair access, I was denied those services because of my disability. 8. Being denied services from Company XYZ hurt my dignity as a person and made me feel as though I was not an equal with other people who do not require the use of a wheelchair. 9. I had to go to another company to receive the services I requested from the Respondent. That other company offers the same services, but at a much higher price. It cost me an additional $1,000 to get the same services I requested from the Respondent.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved