Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Semantic Associations in Recommender Systems: Expanding Personalization, Study notes of Computer Science

A method for improving recommender systems through reasoning over semantic web data. The authors present a content-based strategy that discovers extra knowledge about user preferences and provides more accurate and flexible personalization processes. They compare the effectiveness of their system with two machine learning-based approaches and discuss the limitations and future work.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-ytn
koofers-user-ytn 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 19

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Semantic Associations in Recommender Systems: Expanding Personalization and more Study notes Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity! ICAI Review James Michaelis CSCI 6965 — Adv. Semantic Technologies (Class 7) 3/3/2009 Semantic Reasoning: A Path To New Possibilities of Personalization. Strategy
 •  Two
key
parts:
 –  Seman:c
associa:ons
 •  Trace
seman:c
bonds
between
the
user’s
preferences
and
 the
items
available
in
the
recommender
system
 •  Formalize
these
bonds
in
a
domain
ontology,
along
with
 their
seman:c
annota:ons
 –  Spreading
Ac:va:on
techniques
 •  Explore
these
seman:c
rela:onships
and
discover
new
 knowledge
related
to
the
users’
interests.
 •  Domain
for
demonstra:on:
Movie/TV
Reviewing
 Seman:c
Associa:ons
 •  Domain
knowledge
is
encoded
in
ontology
 •  In
turn,
users
can
specify
interest
in
certain
movies,
using
 parameter
DegreesOfInterest
(con:nuous
variable
ranging
 from
1
to
‐1)
 •  With
user
preferences
entered,
traversal
through
domain
 ontology
takes
place
 •  Relevance
Index
computed
through
following
metrics:
 –  
ρ‐path
associa:on:
Applies
for
two
programs
linked

by
a
chain
 or
sequence
of
proper:es
in
the
ontology.
 –  
ρ‐join
associa:on:
Two
programs
with
respec:ve
akributes
 belonging
to
the
same
class
in
the
domain
ontology.
 –  
ρ‐cp
associa:on:
Two
programs
sharing
a
common
ancestor
in
 the
genre
hierarchy
defined
in
the
ontology.

 Semantic Associations _ ee a anCaeecr Semantic Associations —_ — a _ p-path (Jerry Maguire, Born on 4th July) cae ae on, p-join (Welcome to Tokyo, The Last Samurai) we RL f/orN p-join (Learn about WW I, Born on 4th July) Come comme — <7 sain (camer) Cm p-ep (Vanilla Sky, The Last Samurai) , “ C Poe p-cp (Danny the Dog, Game of Death) SS ) cc. a> ce. ae p-path (Danny the Dog, Million Dollar Baby) wwii, : \\atsouire ) + Seam Sy) Samara i — Ne para) (Woteoma ihe Dog Dollar Baby 4th of July ‘Shut of Glery te Tokyo Toyo Kyoto er = Kung Fu Kamte a 1D, Karate 10, atic ag MasTepie 1D, aes ‘Dollar Baby. Has Actor Raney Teties Bace Lee Morgan he Dog > Game of Freeman / Actorin Hastopic_( Come Hasactor Kung Fu Wor Nicole Aaem seat —"\_ Var, }-—— Drecormn — HasActressy Kidman WW ner rope nt otGiony —e ‘Stantey >, Eyes wide os Saaieeee nis 1D, ) Masdeector Haaren "Otsd fo Tearyo, Tetyo on Aetoan Tom 1D, rata —_—_— rabid Ath of duly * Cruise. HasActor if a HasTopc ae SY L nals 0 Jey — — Maguire | vaspwecter 54 Kyoto ee 1D, 1. )*rarsa Ip, ) "ie (Cameran ‘4 HasDirector Evalua:on
 •  Authors
implemented
prototype
of
recommender
 system
for
tes:ng
purposes
including:
 – An
OWL
ontology
covering
the
domain
of
TV
shows

 •  Similar
to
the
movie
ontology
the
technology
was
developed
 around
 – User
modeling
technique
based
on
ontology‐profiles
 •  Goal
of
study
was
to:
 –  To
evaluate
the
accuracy
of
our
reasoning‐based
 recommenda:ons
 –  To
compare
this
approach
with
two
exis:ng
machine‐ learning
techniques
that
are
devoid
of
seman:c
 inference
capabili:es
used
by
authors.
 Evalua:on
 •  400
Students
asked
to
rate
400
TV
programs
on
 con:nuous
scale
of
[‐1,1]
 •  40
%
of
student
evalua:ons
used
as
training
data
 for
the
two
machine
learning
techniques
 •  For
remaining
60%
of
students,
the
following
 took
place:
 –  10
good,
and
10
bad
TV
shows
randomly
selected
 from
each
student
evalua:on
to
build
profile
 –  In
turn,
these
profiles
were
fed
into
the
authors
 recommenda:ons
system,
as
well
as
the
other
two
 systems
 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Results C0 Asso-SA (threshold = 0.65) O Rules [| i sem-cF lt 10 8 6 — 4 2 o 2 2 Precision Review
of
Paper
 •  Significance
of
Results:
8/10
 –  Interes:ng
comparison
done
between
the
authors
 system
and
two
alternate
systems
 – However,
it
is
not
par:cularly
clear
why
these
two
 were
selected
(a
likle
more
background
on
 selec:on
ra:onale
would
be
helpful)
 –  In
addi:on,
expanding
the
pool
of
par:cipants
and
 or
domain
data
in
a
follow‐up
evalua:on
would
be
 helpful
(an
inten:on
the
authors
expressed
as
 future
work).
 Review
of
Paper
 •  Technical
Soundness:
8/10
 –  Specifics
of
some
techniques
(such
as
those
used
to
 compute
significance
of
proper:es
related
to
movies
 rated
by
users)
omiked
from
paper
due
to
length
 constraints
 •  However,
a
thorough
technical
review
of
all
the
 techniques
used
in
this
system
given
in
Blanco
Y.
 et
al.

 – A
Flexible
seman:c
inference
methodology
to
reason
 about
user
preferences
in
knowledge
based
 recommender
systems.
Knowledge‐based
Systems,
In
 press.
 Review
of
Paper
 •  Quality
of
Evalua:on:
6/10
 – Two
metrics
used
for
ra:ng
effec:veness
of
three
 techniques
 •  Recall:
Defined
as
the
percent
of
returned
programs
 that
the
user
rated
interes:ng
 •  Precision:
Defined
as
percent
of
programs
returned
 with
posi:ve
user
ra:ng
on
[‐1,1]
scale
 – Not
very
well
defined
what
dis:nguishes
these
 metrics
in
the
results
 – Expanded
sta:s:cal
analysis
would
be
helpful


Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved