Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Solutions of Schrodinger's Equation: Particle in a Box - Slides | PHYS 486, Study notes of Quantum Physics

Material Type: Notes; Class: Quantum Physics I; Subject: Physics; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/16/2009

koofers-user-08o-1
koofers-user-08o-1 🇺🇸

5

(2)

10 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions of Schrodinger's Equation: Particle in a Box - Slides | PHYS 486 and more Study notes Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity! Page 1 Physics 486 Lecture 4 Physics 486, Spring ‘07 Lecture 4 Solutions of Schrödinger’s Equation: Particle in a Box The Schrödinger Equation Recall from last lecture that there are two different forms for the “matter” wave equation by Schrodinger: A time-independent Schrödinger Equation: 2 2 22 V E m x ψ ψ ψ− ∂ + = ∂ The time-dependent Schrödinger Equation: 2 2 22 i V t m x ψ ψ ψ∂ − ∂= + ∂ ∂ Most general form Special case Special Solutions to SEQ: Eigenstates To see the connection between these two forms of the SEQ, let’s consider the general time-dependent equation: This method is known as a “separation of variables”, and we’ll see that these solutions correspond to a special case of interest to us. Let’s consider solutions to this general equation that can be written as a product of functions: ( )txtx ϕψ )(),( =Ψ ( ) ( ) ( ) t txitxxV x tx m ∂ ∂ =+ ∂ ∂ − ,),(, 2 2 22 ψψψ The resulting time-dependent SEQ can be written: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t txitxxV x tx m ∂ ∂ =+ ∂ ∂ − ϕψϕψϕψ )()( 2 2 22 Special Solutions to SEQ: Eigenstates Which can then be written: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t txitxxV x xt m ∂ ∂ =+ ∂ ∂ − ϕψϕψψϕ )()( 2 2 22 Dividing both sides of the above equation by ( )txtx ϕψ )(),( =Ψ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t t t ixV x x xm ∂ ∂ =+ ∂ ∂ − ϕ ϕ ψ ψ 11 2 2 22 Note that we now have an equation that depends only on x on the left, and an equation that depends only on t on the right. The only way that both equations can equal one another for all x and t is if they are equal to the same constant, C: : ( ) ( ) C t t t i = ∂ ∂ϕ ϕ 1 ⇒ ( ) ( )tC t ti ϕϕ = ∂ ∂ Page 2 Physics 486 Lecture 4 Special Solutions to SEQ: Eigenstates Also: Clearly, comparing the above result with our earlier result for the time-independent SEQ, C = total energy, E What does this mean? The solutions to this form of the SEQ (these are called eigenstates of the SEQ equation, for reasons we’ll discuss soon) are those having a single well-defined energy E! What is the time dependence of these “special” solutions. To see this, let’s solve for ϕ(t): ( ) ( ) ( ) CxV dx xd xm =+− 2 22 1 2 ψ ψ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )xCxxV dx xd m ψψψ =+− 2 22 2⇒ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )xExxV dx xd m ψψψ =+− 2 22 2 ( ) ( )tE dt tdi ϕϕ = ⇒ ( ) ( ) ( )titEi dt td ωϕϕϕ −=−= ( ) tiet ωϕ −=⇒ Time-dependence of Eigenstates So, solutions to the SEQ with a single well-defined energy E (“eigenstates”) have a time-dependence: Ee)x()t,x( ti =ωψ=Ψ ω− with What is the physical significance of this complex time dependence? Nothing because what we measure is |Ψ(x,t)|2: 2ti*ti2 )x(e)x(e)x()t,x( ψ=ψ×ψ=Ψ ω+ω− Therefore, the probability density |Ψ(x,t)|2 associated with eigenstates of the SEQ don’t change with time!! So, eigenstates of the SEQ, i.e., quantum states with a well-defined energy, are stationary states, in the sense that their probability densities don’t evolve with time! Thus, the SEQ provides a clear explanation for Bohr’s stationary orbit postulate! The “stationary orbits” are simply solutions to the time-independent SEQ! This wavefunction has a “complex” time-dependence The Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation )()()()( 2 2 22 xExxV dx xd m ψψψ =+− To reiterate, the probability densities |ψ | 2 associated with the solutions to the time-independent SEQ do not change with time…they are in “stationary states” For the next few lectures, we will focus on the time-independent SEQ for a variety of physically interesting situations. Again, these situations are pertinent ONLY when the particle’s wavefunction is associated with a single energy E (we’ll come back to the more general case later). For the time being, we’ll also focus on the 1-dimensional case: ψ(x,y,z) ψ(x) π = 2 h Application of SEQ: Particle in Box KE term PE term Total E term V = 0 for 0 < x < L V = ∞ everywhere else )()()()( 2 2 22 xExxV dx xd m ψψψ =+− V(x) 0 L ∞ ∞ As a specific important example, consider a quantum particle confined to a small region, 0 < x < L, by infinite potential walls. We call this a “one-dimensional (1D) box”. Recall, from last lecture, the time-independent SEQ in one dimension: Page 5 Physics 486 Lecture 4 Eigenstates of ISW Potential      = x L nBxn πψ sin)( We need to “normalize” this wavefunction, i.e., find the “normalization factor” B, by setting the total probability of finding the particle in the well equal to one: 2 2 2 2 0 Total probability sin 2 L n Ldx B x dx B L πψ    = = =       ∫ ∫ = 1 B = What about the allowed solutions (eigenstates) for the ISW potential? 1/ 22 L       n = 1,2,3,… So, the general solutions (“eigenstates”) for this potential are:     = x L n L xn πψ sin2)( n = 1,2,3,… V=∞ ψ(x) 0 L V=∞n=1 n=2 x n=3 Particles in Confined Potentials Important general result from the “particle-in-box”: Energy quantization in all “quantum” systems, including atoms, arises because only particle wavefunctions that “fit” within the constraints of the confining potential, and their associated energies, are allowed Quantum example: Particle-in-box Only wavefunctions (and corresponding energies) having an integral # of half-wavelengths that precisely “fit” in well are allowed E B Quantized energy levels in a real “quantum dot” (portal.research.bell-labs.com) Standing waves: classical example Only frequencies corresponding to wavelengths that “fit” within constraints give standing waves Standing waves on a constrained string Real standing waves of electron density in a “quantum corral” IBM Almaden Single atoms (Fe) Cu Standing waves: quantum example Page 6 Physics 486 Lecture 4 Particle-in-Box: Example Calculate ground state energy and energy for a transition. An electron is trapped in a “quantum nanobox” that is L = 4 nm long. Assuming that the potential seen by the electron is approximately that of an infinite square well, estimate the ground (lowest) state energy of the electron. Allowed energies for electron in a 1D box: What photon energy is required to excite the trapped electron to the next available energy level (i.e., n = 2)? L/n2 n =λ 1 2 n EnE = So, energy difference between n = 2 and n = 1 levels: ( ) 122 E 12E −=∆ 1E3= = 0.071 eV E1 = ground state energy (n = 1) V=∞ V=∞ 0 xL En n=1 n=2 n=3 eV 0235.0 )nm4(4 nmeV 505.1E L4 nmeV 505.1 mL8 hE withnEE nmeV 505.1 m2 hE 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1n 2 n 2 2 n 2 n = ⋅ = ⋅ === ⋅ == λλ Probability Densities ψ V=∞ V=∞ 0 xL ψ 0 xL ψ 0 xL The square of the eigenstates give the probability densities, |ψ(x)|2:      = x L n L xn πψ sin2)(      = x L n L xn πψ 22 sin2)( n=1 |ψ|2 0 xL 2/L n=2 |ψ|2 0 xL 2/L |ψ|2 0 xL n=3 2/L General Properties of Bound States Several trends exhibited by the particle-in-box states are generic to bound state wavefunctions in any potential (even complicated ones). (2). The lowest energy bound state always has finite energy -- a “zero-point” energy Why? Even the lowest energy bound state requires some wavefunction curvature (kinetic energy) to satisfy boundary conditions (1) The overall curvature of the wavefunction increases with increasing kinetic energy, T = E-V. 2 22 )( 2 dx xd m ψ −       m2 plike 2 V=∞ ψ(x) 0 L V=∞n=1 n=2 x n=3 V=∞ V=∞ 0 xL En n=1 n=2 n=3 T1 T2 T3 General Properties of Bound States (3). The -th eigenstate) has ( -1) zero-crossings. (e.g., the first (ground) eigenstate has 0, the second eigenstate has 1, the third eigenstate has 2, etc.,…) (4). If the potential V(x) has a center of symmetry (such as the center of the well above), the eigenstates will be (alternating) even and odd functions about that center of symmetry V=∞ ψ(x) 0 L V=∞n=1 n=2 x n=3 Page 7 Physics 486 Lecture 4 General Properties of Bound States (5). Effects of a change in potential: A change in potential will be reflected in a change in the curvature of the wavefunction (see rule #1), since the curvature increases with increasing T=E-V(x). But what about the amplitude of the wavefunction? V=∞ 0 L V=∞ x I II Consider the change in potential between regions I and II above. The wavefunction, and its derivative, can be written: )sin( ϕψ += kxA )cos(/ ϕψ += kxAkdxd Squaring both of these relations and adding gives: ( ) ( ))(cos)(sin)(cos)(sin/ 2222222212 ϕϕϕϕψψ +++=+++=+ − kxkxAkxAkxAdxdk ( ) 2212 / Adxdk =+ − ψψ ( )212 / dxdkA ψψ −+= Across the boundary between I and II, both ψ and dψ/dx MUST be continuous, while k can change discontinuously. So, as k=(2m(E-V)/ 2)1/2 decreases across the boundary, A must increase. Classically, we would say that the probability amplitude increases w/ decreasing k because the particle moves more slowly there. Bound State Properties: Example E5 V=∞ V=∞ 0 L x Uo x ψ Let’s reinforce your intuition about the properties of bound state wavefunctions with this example: Through “nano-engineering,” you are able to create a “step” in the potential “seen” by an electron trapped in a 1D structure, as shown below. You’d like to estimate the wavefunction for an electron in the 5th energy level of this potential, without solving the SEQ. Qualitatively sketch the 5th wavefunction: Bound State Properties: Example E5 V=∞ V=∞ 0 L x Uo x ψ Let’s reinforce your intuition about the properties of bound state wavefunctions with this example: Through “nano-engineering,” you are able to create a “step” in the potential “seen” by an electron trapped in a 1D structure, as shown below. You’d like to estimate the wavefunction for an electron in the 5th energy level of this potential, without solving the SEQ. Qualitatively sketch the 5th wavefunction: Things to consider: (2) Wavefunction must go to zero at x = 0 and x = L. (3) Kinetic energy is lower on right side of well, so the curvature of ψ is smaller there (wavelength is longer). (4) Kinetic energy is lower on right side, so amplitude of ψ is larger there. (Classically, the particle spends more time there because it is moving more slowly). (1) 5th wavefunction has 4 zero-crossings The wavefunction below describes a quantum particle in a range ∆x: ψ(x) x ∆x In what energy level is the particle? n = (a) 7 (b) 8 (c) 9 Bound States: Another Example
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved