Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Stat 411 Homework 10: Statistical Inference and Hypothesis Testing, Assignments of Statistics

Solutions to problem 6.3.5, 6.3.18, and additional exercises from stat 411 - introduction to probability and statistics course. The problems involve deriving approximate size α tests using wilk's theorem, finding the maximum likelihood estimator (mle), and understanding the power function for likelihood ratio tests.

Typology: Assignments

2011/2012

Uploaded on 05/18/2012

koofers-user-f2j
koofers-user-f2j 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Stat 411 Homework 10: Statistical Inference and Hypothesis Testing and more Assignments Statistics in PDF only on Docsity! Stat 411 – Homework 10 Due: Wednesday 04/11 Undergraduates may solve the “Graduate only” problem(s) for possible extra credit. 1. Problem 6.3.5 on page 339. Take µ0 = 0 for simplicity (and no loss of generality). 2. Let X1, . . . , Xn iid∼ fθ(x) = θxθ−1, where x ∈ (0, 1) and θ > 0. Use Wilk’s theorem (i.e., Theorem 6.3.1 in the text) to derive an approximate size α test of H0 : θ = θ0 versus H1 : θ 6= θ0. 3. Problem 6.3.18 on page 342. Also, in part (a), give an intuitive explanation for setting Λ = 0 when Yn > θ0. Hints for part (b), where θ = θ0: (i) Yn is definitely less than θ0; (ii) Z = Yn/θ0 has the same distribution as that of the maximum of n iid Unif(0, 1) random variables; (iii) we know the CDF for Z; (iv) the chi-square distribution with 2 degrees of freedom is the same as an exponential distribution with mean 0.5. 4. Let X1, . . . , Xn iid∼ N(µ, σ2) where both µ and σ2 are unknown. Derive the exact size α likelihood ratio test of H0 : µ = µ0 versus H1 : µ 6= µ0—Wilk’s theorem isn’t allowed here! 5. (Graduate only) According to Mendel’s law, the genotypes aa, Aa, and AA in a population in equilibrium (with respect to a single gene with two alleles) have proportions θ2, 2θ(1 − θ), and (1 − θ)2, respectively, where θ ∈ (0, 1). From this population, a sample of n individuals is taken, of which Naa, NAa, and NAA in- dividuals have genotypes aa, Aa, and AA, respectively. Note that, by definition, Naa +NAa +NAA = n. (a) Find the MLE θ̂. (Hint: This is a special kind of multinomial distribution; see page 138.) (b) Use Wilk’s theorem to derive an approximate size α likelihood ratio test of H0 : θ = θ0 versus H1 : θ 6= θ0. An optional problem involving software. Plot the power function for the likelihood ratio test derived Problem 1 above; take θ0 = 1, µ0 = 0, and n = 10. (Hint: In R, you’ll need the pchisq function, which returns the CDF for a chi-square distribution.) 1 Stat 411 – Homework 10 Solutions 1. Problem 6.3.5 from the text. Let X1, . . . , Xn iid∼ N(0, θ) where θ is the variance.1 We’ve shown several times that the MLE of θ is θ̂ = 1 n ∑n i=1X 2 i . Therefore, the likelihood ratio statistic is Λ = L(θ0) L(θ̂) = θ−n0 e −(nθ̂/2θ0) θ̂−ne−n/2 = ( θ̂ θ0 )n e− n 2 (θ̂/θ0−1). If W = nθ̂/θ0 = θ −1 0 ∑n i=1X 2 i , then Λ = g(W ) = n−nen/2W ne−W/2. Since Λ is a function of W , the likelihood ratio test can be based on W . That is, a rule which rejects H0 iff Λ is too small is equivalent to a test which rejects H0 iff W falls in some set to be determined. The null distribution of W (i.e., its distribution when the null hypothesis H0 : θ = θ0 is true) can be found by writing W as W = 1 θ0 n∑ i=1 X2i = n∑ i=1 (Xi/ √ θ0) 2. The random variables Xi/ √ θ0, i = 1, . . . , n are independent standard normal. So their squares are independent chi-square with one degree of freedom. From Cochran’s theorem,2 the sum of n independent ChiSq(1) random variables is a ChiSq(n) random variable. Therefore, W ∼ ChiSq(n) is the null distribution.3 To find the rejection region for W , we need to understand the shape of the function g(w) given above. Ignoring the parts not involving w, g(w) resembles the PDF formula for a gamma random variable. These PDFs start at 0, increase for a while, and then decrease to 0 as w → ∞. Therefore, Λ ≤ k iff W ≤ k′1 or W ≥ k′2. To find k′1, k ′ 2 we need to solve the equation: α = Pθ0(W ≤ k′1 or W ≥ k′2) = Pθ0(W ≤ k′1) + Pθ0(W ≥ k′2), where α is the desired size. Let’s do this by making each term in the sum equal α/2. Then we should take k′1 = χ 2 n,1−α/2 and k ′ 2 = χ 2 n,α/2, the upper percentile points from the ChiSq(n) distribution. For example, if n = 10 and α = 0.05, then k′1 = 3.247 and k′2 = 20.483, from Table II on page 673. Finally, we have the following testing rule for the exact size α likelihood ratio test in terms of W : Reject H0 iff W ≤ χ2n,1−α/2 or W ≥ χ2n,α/2. 1I’ve taken the mean µ0 to be zero without loss of generality. 2That is, if Ui ∼ ChiSq(di), i = 1, . . . , n, are independent, then ∑n i=1 Ui ∼ ChiSq(d) with d = ∑n i=1 di; see Theorem 3.5.4 in the text. 3The distribution of W under a general θ value is a multiple of ChiSq(n). 1
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved