Evaluation of ICM EPG for CSCI 577A (Fall 2008): Data, Templates & Support Docs., Assignments of Software Engineering

Download Evaluation of ICM EPG for CSCI 577A (Fall 2008): Data, Templates & Support Docs. and more Assignments Software Engineering in PDF only on Docsity! HW4: ICM EPG Evaluation CSCI 577A (Fall 2008) Shahid Shoaib – USC# 6986725671 Artifacts evaluated: o Supporting Information Document o System and Software Architecture Description & UML Model o System and Software Requirements Definition o WikiWinWin Report 1. Supporting Information Document Expected Data Content 1. Does the ICM EPG specify expected data content for each section of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the description that explains about expected data content. Yes http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/guidances/guidelines/supporting_information_docume nt_completion_criteria_1C0F27F4.html 2. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the expected data content of this artifact? If yes, please specify. Suggestion: the placeholder for SID (http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/workproducts/supporting_information_document_FC 6C9FAD.html ) should have link to Usage Guidelines (http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/guidances/guidelines/supporting_information_docume nt_completion_criteria_1C0F27F4.html) . 3. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this expected data content? If yes, please specify. No. Template/format 4. Does the ICM EPG provide template of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the template. Yes http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/guidances/templates/supporting_information_document_template _1BC9A76E.html 5. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the template of this artifact? If yes, please specify. The template is bare-bones and comes with section headings but no description on what kind of content is expected in each section. It would be useful if there were some comments describing general guidelines for each section of the document. 6. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this template? If yes, please specify. No Example Document 7. Does the ICM EPG provide example document of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the example document. Yes http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/guidances/examples/resources/SID_OCP_S07b_T03_V10.0.doc 8. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the example document of this artifact? If yes, please specify No. . 9. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this example document? If yes, please specify. No. Intended Use 10. Does the ICM EPG provide information about Intended Use of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the description that explains about intended use of this artifact. All we are given from http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/workproducts/supporting_information_document_FC6 C9FAD.html is that SID is maintained by Development team and its used as an Input to Construct Traceability matrix. There is some information here http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.mgmt.quality_mgmt.base/guidances/guidelines/supporting_information_docume nt_completion_criteria_1C0F27F4.html that describes ICM phases where SID has to be created/updated. 11. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the information about intended use of this artifact? If yes, please specify. Should specify more clearly the intended use of SID 12. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this Intended use? If yes, please specify. The intended use should be specified clearly so that stakeholders do not get confused and this document is used appropriately. 2. System and Software Architecture Description & UML Model Expected Data Content 1. Does the ICM EPG specify expected data content for each section of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the description that explains about expected data content. There is some general guidance on SSAD here: http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/index.htm#practice.tech.sys_and_sw_arch_development.base/guidances/guidelines/system_and_soft ware_arch_desc_completion_criteria_46ED2AD5.html 2. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the expected data content of this artifact? If yes, please specify. No 3. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this expected data content? If yes, please specify. No Template/format 4. Does the ICM EPG provide template of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the template. Yes http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/practice.tech.sys_and_sw_arch_development.base/guidances/templates/resources/IICMSw_SSAD_T emplate.doc 5. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the template of this artifact? If yes, please specify. The template is bare-bones and comes with section headings but no description on what kind of content is expected in each section. It would be useful if there were some comments describing general guidelines for each section of the document. 6. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this template? If yes, please specify. No Example Document 7. Does the ICM EPG provide example document of this artifact? If yes, please provide the link to the example document. Yes http://greenbay.usc.edu/IICMSw/practice.tech.sys_and_sw_arch_development.base/guidances/examples/resources/SSAD_FCR_F06a _T03_V2.2.doc 8. Is there anything missing or anything wrong for the example document of this artifact? If yes, please specify. The document failed to open on MS Word 2003 9. Is there any critical issue, concern, risk regarding this example document? If yes, please specify. Example fails to open.