Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Terminology - GIS and Mapping - Lecture Slides, Slides of Geochemistry

In these Lecture Slides, the primary aim of the Lecturer is to illustrate the following key points : Terminology, Introduction, Data Quality and Errors, Terminology, Accuracy and Precision, Resolution and Generalisation, Currency and Completeness, Compatibility and Consistency, Applicability, Sources Of Error

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 07/23/2013

ramanuja
ramanuja 🇮🇳

4.7

(3)

68 documents

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Terminology - GIS and Mapping - Lecture Slides and more Slides Geochemistry in PDF only on Docsity! Introduction • There is a tendancy to assume all data in a GIS, both locational and attribute, is accurate. • This is never the case. • Today we will look at: – Terminology to describe data quality; – Sources of error in GIS ; and – How errors can be modelled Docsity.com Terminology • Data quality and errors • Accuracy and precision • Bias • Resolution and generalisation • Currency and completeness • Compatibility and consistency • Applicability Docsity.com Data Input Errors(2) • Digitising Issues – Sliver lines – Dangling nodes (undershoot and overshoot) – Weird polygons / polygonal knots – Snapping tolerance – Spatial and attribute pseudo nodes • Attribute Data Errors – Primary – Secondary Docsity.com Processing And Display Errors • Some processing errors: – Conversions between raster and vector – Interpolation of field data – Rounding errors – Use errors • Data display errors: – May involve vector to raster conversions Docsity.com Modelling Data Errors • Apart from trying to eliminate errors, good practice should entail some attempt to model the errors. • Attribute data can be modelled using conventional statistical methods – e.g. standard errors • If interpolating surfaces from sample points, methods such as kriging permit an estimate of the variance to be made for interpolated points. • Categorical data errors can be quantified using a misclassification matrix. Docsity.com Metadata • Given that errors can never be completely eliminated, good practice entails providing metadata (data about data). • Various standards have arisen (e.g. INSPIRE). • The following table provides an indication of the sort of thing that should be included. Docsity.com Data exchange format Data summary Lineage Co-ordinate system Spatial data model Feature coding system Classification completeness Geographical coverage Positional accuracy Attribute accuracy “val accuracy i representation Data storage format. Data sources, areal coverage, classification used, date collected, scale, etc. Agency of origin, method of data collection, primary survey techniques, digitising method. Dates updated. Processing history: co-ordinate transformations, data model translations, attribute transformations. Type of co-ordinate system. Map projection parameters. Specification of primitive spatial objects. Topological data stored. Definition of feature codes and classification system. Documentation on the extent of usage of classification system. Overall extent. Detailed specification of coverage if not complete. Statistics on co-ordinate errors. Statistics on attribute errors. Methods of topology validation employed. Graphical symbolism for each feature class. Text fonts for annotation. Dacsity cd ad
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved