The Final Review Sheet - Principles of Microeconomics | ECON 101, Study notes of Microeconomics

Download The Final Review Sheet - Principles of Microeconomics | ECON 101 and more Study notes Microeconomics in PDF only on Docsity! Economics 101 Spring 2005 The Final Review Sheet (Prof. Kelly) Note: This is a list of important and key points for topics after the second midterm. This list should be used together with the previous two review lists as the final will be cumulative. As before, these review sheets should serve as a checklist for you to see whether you have studied everything you need to for the final. To do well in the final, you should focus on your lecture and section notes, as well as the practice questions. Good luck in your study! MONOPOLY 1. Definition and fundamental sources of Monopoly. ---Barriers to entry (examples?): a. exclusive ownership of a key resource; b. exclusive right assigned by the government; c. economies of scale; d. threat of force or sabotage. 2. Natural Monopoly. ---arises where it’s more efficient for a single firm to serve the society. (Examples? What will happen if we have more than one firm in the market?) 3. Profit Maximization Condition (for a single-price monopoly): MR=MC. a. The demand curve facing a monopoly is the same as the industry demand curve; b. MC and ATC are similar to those for perfectly competitive firms; c. MR is less than the price: MR<P (why?); IMPORTANT: if demand is linear, P=a-bQ (a, b are positive constants), then marginal revenue is: MR = a-2bQ. (Math: TR=P*Q=aQ-bQ2, MR=dTR/dQ=a-2bQ.) d. The Monopoly can earn an economic profit even in the LR (there is no entry!). 4. Inefficiency of Monopoly. a. Compared to an identical perfectly competitive industry, output is less and price is higher with a monopoly; b. Less output and higher price will result in a loss in Consumer Surplus (CS) relative to the CS found under perfect competition and an increase in Producer Surplus (PS) relative to the PS found under perfect competition---and there will be a Dead-Weight Loss with the monopoly (Be careful: does PS have anything to do with the ATC curve?); c. DWL, which measures the inefficiency of the monopoly, is graphically the area between the demand and MC curves for units between the monopoly quantity and the efficient quantity. 5. Ways for policy makers to correct the inefficiency. a. antitrust laws; b. regulations (AC regulation and MC regulation); c. public ownership. 6. Price Discrimination--selling different units of a good/service for different prices. a. price discrimination captures some Consumer Surplus and increases the monopoly’s total revenue; b. forms of price discrimination (and examples?). (1) First-Degree price discrimination; (2) Second-Degree price discrimination; (3) Third-Degree price discrimination. OLIGOPOLY 1. Definition---Between Monopoly and Perfect Competition. A market structure where only a few sellers offer similar or identical products. (How is it different from the Monopolistic Competition? Examples?) 2. Oligopolistic Markets. A: Key feature: tension between cooperation and self-interest. a. The group of oligopolists is better off if they cooperate and act like a monopoly --- producing less and charging a higher price; b. But every oligopolist has an incentive to act on his own as it cares only about its own profit; àability to cooperate is limited. B: Duopoly: an oligopoly with only TWO members. ---simplest form of oligopoly! C: Collusion; Cartel. 3. Equilibrium for an oligopoly. a. it’s often difficult for oligopolies to form cartels; ---antitrust laws; unstability of cartels. b. Our notion of equilibrium from the lecture; c. when firms in an oligopoly individually choose production to maximize profit, they end up somewhere between perfect competition and monopoly; ---monopoly quantity < oligopoly quantity < competitive quantity; ---monopoly price > oligopoly price > competitive price. d. the size of an oligopoly: an oligopolistic market looks MORE like a competitive market if there are MORE sellers in the oligopoly! 4. Some Game Theory.  Consumption Externalities create a difference between MPB and MSB. With positive (negative) consumption externalities, MSB lies above (below) MPC. As a result, the market output is less (more) than the socially optimal output.  The presence of externalities creates a deadweight loss (DWL). DWL is caused by the difference between the market output and the socially optimal output. If there is no difference, then there is no DWL. A very easy to calculate the DWL is to use the following formula; DWL= ))(( 2 1 ms QQyExternalit  , where Qs is the socially optimal output (MSC=MSB) and Qm is the market equilibrium output (MPC=MPB). Externality is the externality per unit. Note that you have to take the absolute value because deadweight loss can never be negative.  Total market surplus (TMS). With positive externality, TMS=CS+PS+ total external benefit. With negative externality, TMS=CS+PS- total external cost. Note that total external benefit (cost) = equilibrium market quantity* external benefit (cost) per unit.  Government intervention. The govt. should impose a tax if there is an external cost and grant a subsidy if there is an external benefit. The tax or the subsidy should be directed to the side that is creating the externality. Thus, positive (negative) production externality implies a subsidy (tax) on producers. Positive (negative) consumption externality implies a subsidy (tax) on consumers.  The aim of government intervention is to reach the social optimum and remove the difference between the market output and the socially output.  The total surplus after govt. intervention is TSsocial = PSsocial + CSsocial + Tax Revenue – Total external cost. (if we have external cost) TSsocial = PSsocial + CSsocial – Subsidy cost + Total external benefit (if we have external benefit) Note that the last two components of each of the above two equations are always equal and so cancel each other out. So, you can ignore them while calculating total surplus and simply add consumer and producer surplus. An even easier way to find out TSsocial is to take the total market surplus (TMS) and add deadweight loss. Thus TSsocial= TMS + DWL. This is because the whole purpose of government intervention is to remove the difference between the market output and the socially output and thereby eliminate the deadweight loss.  Apart from taxes and subsidies, the government can also use regulation to resolve the externality problem.  There are private solutions to the externality problem as well. Refer to Mankiw’s discussion of the issue. The most important such solution is to assign property rights to one of the individuals concerned. It does not matter whether the rights are granted to the individual creating the externality or the individual affected by the externality. The Coase Theorem says that either way, the individuals concerned will be able to arrive at the efficient solution through mutual bargaining. Note that one critical assumption of the Coase theorem is the absence of any transaction costs. The presence of such costs can lead to breakdown of bargaining. Bargaining may also break down if the number of individuals concerned is very large. Then the efficient level of output may not be reached through bargaining. PUBLIC GOODS AND COMMON RESOURCES:  Concepts of rivalry and excludability.  Distinction between private goods, natural monopolies, common resources, and public goods on the basis of whether they are rival and/or excludable.  Public goods are neither rival nor excludable. Common resources are rival but not excludable.  Examples of public goods are national defence, basic research etc.  The aggregate demand curve for a public good is obtained by the vertical summation (not horizontal as is the case with private goods) of the individual demand curves. At each quantity level, we see the willingness to pay of each individual and then estimate society’s total willingness to pay by adding the willingness to pay of the various individuals.  Of course, the above point is the ideal situation in which we assume that we know the preference or the willingness to pay of each individual. But this is very difficult to know because people will usually tend to lie and understate their willingness to pay in the hope that somebody else will pay for the public good and they will be able to enjoy it for free (because it is non-rival and non-excludable). This problem is the free rider problem.  Examples of common resources are clean water and air, congested roads, wildlife etc.  Tragedy of the Commons. The tragedy occurs because when people use the common resource, they reduce its availability for other users. Since the users are not paying for this reduction, they are creating a negative externality. This negative externality causes too much use of the commons relative to the socially optimal amount of use. One possible solution to the tragedy is to assign property rights over the commons to one of the users. ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION. 1. Moral Hazard; 2. Adverse Selection; 3. Principle Agent Problem; 4. Ways to Reduce Asymmetric Information.