Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Ozone Hole and Measuring Ozone in the Earth's Atmosphere, Exercises of Environmental Science

The science behind the ozone hole and how scientists measure ozone in the Earth's atmosphere. It describes how man-made chemicals like CFCs destroy ozone and how scientists use satellites to measure ozone concentrations globally. The document also explains how the polar vortex over the Antarctic creates unique conditions for chemical reactions that lead to the thinning of the ozone layer.

Typology: Exercises

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/14/2023

carlick
carlick 🇺🇸

4.2

(11)

44 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download The Ozone Hole and Measuring Ozone in the Earth's Atmosphere and more Exercises Environmental Science in PDF only on Docsity! 9791 0891 1891 2891 3891 4891 5891 6891 7891 8891 9891 0991 1991 2991 3991 4991 5991 6991 7991 8991 9991 0002 1002 2002 3002 4002 5002 6002 7002 8002 9002 0102 1102 2102 NO DATA 30 25 20 15 10 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 9695 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 5 m illi on s k m 2 A re a of O zo ne H ol e NIMBUS-7 METEOR-3 Earth Probe EOS Aura Suomi NPP National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov Companion booklet to the Ozone Hole Poster The Ozone Hole 1000 200 300 400 500 October Total Ozone 1979–2012 Dobson Units 3 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) In the 1970’s, scientists suspected that reactions involving man-made chlorine-containing com- pounds could upset this balance leading to lower levels of ozone in the stratosphere. Think again of the “leaky bucket.” Putting additional ozone-destroying compounds into the atmosphere is like increasing the size of the holes in our “bucket” of ozone. The larger holes cause ozone to leak out at a faster rate than ozone is being created. Consequently, the level of ozone protecting us from ultraviolet radiation decreases. The ozone destroyed by manmade emissions is compa- rable or more than the amount destroyed by natural processes. Human production of chlorine-containing chemicals, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), has added an additional factor that destroys ozone. CFCs are molecules made up of chlorine, fluo- rine and carbon. Because they are extremely stable molecules, CFCs do not react with other chemicals in the lower atmosphere, but exposure to ultraviolet radiation in the stratosphere breaks them apart, releasing chlorine atoms. Free chlorine (Cl) atoms then react with ozone molecules, taking one oxygen atom to form chlo- rine monoxide (ClO) and leaving an oxygen molecule (O2). If each chlorine atom released from a CFC molecule destroyed only one ozone molecule, CFCs would pose very little threat to the ozone layer. However, when a chlorine monoxide molecule encounters a free atom of oxygen, the oxygen atom breaks up the chlorine monoxide, stealing the oxygen atom and releasing the chlorine atom back into the stratosphere to destroy another ozone molecule. These two reactions happen over and over again, so that a single atom of chlorine, acting as a catalyst, destroys many molecules (about 100,000) of ozone. Fortunately, chlorine atoms do not remain in the stratosphere forever. Free chlorine atoms react with gases, such as methane (CH4), and get bound up into hydrogen chloride (HCl) molecules. These molecules eventually end up back in the troposphere where they are washed away by rain. Therefore, if humans stop putting CFCs and other ozone-destroying chemicals into the stratosphere, stratospheric ozone will eventually return to its earlier, higher values. O2O3 + + ClOCl O2O + + ClO Cl 4 Measuring Ozone in the Earth’s Atmosphere Scientists have been measuring ozone since the 1920’s using ground-based instruments that look skyward. Data from these instruments, although useful in learning about ozone, only tell us about the ozone above their sites, and do not provide a picture of global ozone concentrations. To get a global view of ozone concentrations and its distribution, scientists use data from satellites. The principle of measuring ozone is simple. We know from measurements how much incoming UV-B sunlight arrives at the top of the Earth’s atmosphere every second. We also know how much light (including UV-B) is scattered by air molecules in the atmosphere--this is called “Rayleigh scat- tering,” and this is the same phenomenon that makes the sky appear blue. So we can calculate the amount of UV-B sunlight that would make it to the Earth’s surface if there were no ozone to absorb it. When we measure the amount of UV-B sunlight from the ground, we find it is much less than what we calculated. The difference is the amount of UV-B absorbed by ozone, and from that we can calculate the amount of ozone. Measuring ozone from space is similar, but you have to know the amount of the solar UV-B light that is backscattered, or bouncing, off molecules in the atmosphere (Rayleigh scattering, again) in the direction of the satellite. This measurement technique is depicted in the figure above. We can calculate how much UV-B light the space-based instrument would observe if there were no ozone. However, the amount of UV-B measured is much less because UV-B is passing through the atmosphere a second time. Again, from the amount of UV-B that’s “missing,” we can calcu- late the amount of ozone. The longest satellite record of ozone data has been from instruments using this backscatter method. The first measurements were taken by the BUV instrument on Nimbus-4 satellite in 1970 followed by the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) instruments on the Nimbus-7, Earth Probe, and Meteor-3 satellites, several SBUVs on NOAA satellites, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard the EOS Aura satellite, and the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) on the Suomi NPP satellite. The Europeans also flew BUV-type instruments on their environmental satellites. Another type of instrument uses occultation to measure ozone, such as the Stratospheric Aero- sol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) instruments including the upcoming SAGE-III-ISS onboard the International Space Station, the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), and Halogen Oc- cultation Experiment (HALOE) on the UARS satellite. Other techniques include measuring the radiation emitted from the atmosphere in the infrared and microwave wavelengths where ozone also absorbs. In addition to the OMI instrument, the Aura satellite carried three other ozone-measuring instru- ments, the High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS), the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) using infrared emission, and the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS). (Note: All these instruments measure several other atmospheric constituents in addition to ozone.) ground-based instrument Rayleigh-scattering (one of many) More UV-B is absorbed as it passes a 2nd time through the ozone layer and atmosphere space-based instrument ozone layer Earth’s surface top of the atmosphere Some UV-B is absorbed by the atmosphere and the ozone layer incoming UV-B 5 How the Ozone Hole forms The Ozone Hole is not really a “hole” but a thinning of the ozone layer over the south polar region. Every year, since at least 1978, there is a sudden, rapid decrease in the stratospheric ozone levels at the end of the Antarctic winter. During the long winter months of darkness over the Antarctic, atmospheric temperatures drop, creating unique conditions for chemical reactions that are not found anywhere else in the atmo- sphere. The wind in the stratosphere over the polar region intensifies and forms a polar vortex, which circulates around the pole. The transition from inside to outside the polar vortex creates a wind barrier that isolates the air inside the vortex and also results in very cold temperatures. At temperatures below -78°C, thin clouds made of mixtures of ice, nitric acid, and sulfuric acid form in the stratosphere. Chemical reactions on the surfaces of these ice crystals convert chlorine-containing compounds like HCl, which is harmless to ozone, into more reactive forms. When the sun rises over the Antarctic in the Spring (September), light rapidly releases free chlorine atoms into the stratosphere. A new ozone destroying cycle begins. The chlorine atoms react with ozone, creating ClO. The ClO molecules combine with each other, forming a com- pound called a dimer. Sunlight releases chlorine atoms from the dimer, and the cycle begins again. The polar vortex keeps the ozone-depleted air inside from mixing with the undepleted air outside the vortex. The ozone destruction continues within the polar vortex until the ozone levels approaches zero at the altitudes where reactions on the thin clouds have released chlorine atoms. Once ozone has reached such a low level, the chlorine atoms react with methane, filling the vortex with HCl. The low ozone persists until the vortex weakens and breaks apart. Then the ozone levels in the polar stratosphere begin to return to pre-September levels due to the increase in solar UV and the mixing of polar and nonpolar air. Southern Hemisphere ozone concentration for four months, representing the four seasons, as measured by the OMI instrument on the Aura satellite. The feature of very low ozone concentrations over a very well-defined region over Antarctica and beyond in the Austral Spring is called the “Ozone Hole.” (The Dobson Unit is the most com- monly used unit for expressing ozone concentration. It’s the amount of ozone that would make a 0.01 millimeter deep layer of pure ozone if it were all brought down to the Earth’s surface. The ozone layer’s average thickness is about 300 Dobson Units, or a surface layer 3 mm deep.) April 2011 July 2011 October 2011 January 2012 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Total Ozone (Dobson Units) Exploring Color Maps Using Stratospheric Ozone Data National Aeronautics and Space Administration Objectives After completing this activity, students should be able to • describe why color maps are used to visualize data • interpret data using a color mapped image • compare and evaluate different color scales Standards (Grades 9-12) NGSS: Practice 4 Analyzing and Interpreting Data AAAS: 12E/H2 Check graphs to see that they do not misrepresent results by using inappropriate scales. AAAS: 11C/H4 Graphs and equations are useful ways for depicting and analyzing patterns of change. NSES: Unifying Concepts and Processes Standard: Evidence, models, and explanation. NSES: Content Standard E: Understandings about sci- ence and technology Materials • Images on the Ozone Hole poster http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/ozoneholeposter/ • Color by Number Worksheet • 7 colored pencils / crayons • Sea Surface Temperature images Engage Ask questions about the front of the poster. When was the ozone hole the smallest? (1979) When did the ozone hole grow the fastest? (1981–1985, pattern of growth, no shrinking) What year had the largest ozone hole? (2006) Ask students to provide evidence for their answers. (the graph, the globes, the colors) Ask how these helped an- swer the questions. Explore Using the “Color by Number” worksheet, ask students to create a visual representation that accurately communi- cates the size of the ozone hole. Invite students to make up their own color scale. The seven ranges of ozone data This lesson will introduce students to the use of color maps to visualize data about stratospheric ozone. Scientists use colors and other representations for data to help interpret and visualize information. Data are mapped to colors and other representations to help the mind interpret this information. Sometimes this means creating an image that looks much like an aerial photo of the planet’s surface, but other data are best mapped to a color scale. Students will create their own color map and discover that selecting a good color scale is both essential to understanding data and to accurately communicating science. For more information, visit: http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/ozoneholeposter/ http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov may be divided any way they like. Ranges don’t have to start at zero and don’t have to be even units. They can choose any colors or shades of colors they like. (If the activity is being done by an individual student, color two maps with different scales.) Encourage students to think about the range and why they choose it. Post the back of the poster so students can gather more information about the ozone hole to help them design their color scales. You can also post some ozone facts on the board. Ozone facts: The average ozone levels over the en- tire globe is 300 Dobson Units. Values lower than 220 Dobson Units are considered part of the ozone hole. In 2006, the worst year for ozone depletion to date, the lowest values of 84 Dobson Units were observed. Explain Post student drawings on the wall and compare. Do any look like there is almost no hole? Which one is easiest to understand? Why? Hardest to understand? Why? Why not use the same color for all types of data? Explain how the different color scales help us to visualize data by drawing attention to what is important, such as the loca- tion of the ozone hole. However, color can also be de- ceptive, such as when there is a break in a color scale that stands out where there is nothing really unique about the data. Evaluate Looking back at the poster, ask students “Why was this particular color scale chosen?” (There is a noticeable break from light to dark blue at 220 DU, where values lower than 220 DU are considered to be the “ozone hole.”) Ask students to think about their scales and de- scribe why they choose certain colors and data ranges. Which data were emphasized or de-emphasized in their color maps? Extension - Comparing Color Scales As we have seen, a data set like ozone data is best represented as a range of colors. However, color scales are arbitrary and can be chosen according to how the data can best be visualized. Hand out, or project on the screen, the Sea Surface Temperature maps. Ask students to compare the 4 different color scales. These maps show the exact same data (September 2011) but use dif- ferent color scales and ranges. This activity could be conducted as a written assess- ment, or journaling activity, or as a class discussion. For small groups, ask students discuss the questions and record their answers as a group. Then invite the groups to share their answers with the class. Comparison 1 - Maps A and B: Q1: Does one map show hotter sea surface tempera- tures than the other? (Neither. Both images are the same data. Map A appears to be hotter because of the amount of red used in the color scale.) Q2: Compare and contrast the two scales? (Both maps use the rainbow colors as their color scale. Map B has a wider green area and less red. Map B shows more detail in the Gulf of Mexico.) Comparison 2 - Maps A and C: Q1: Are there any features that stand out in one and not the other? (In Map A, there appears to be a feature flowing east from the north eastern United States. This appears to be significant because the color scale shows strong breaks between red, yel- low and green. However, there is not a significant change in the temperature data as the image sug- gests.) Q2: Which one do you think a color blind person could interpret? (Map C because this map can also be interpreted if printed in black and white. Addition- ally some people who have a difficulty distinguish- ing between green and blue would have a hard time interpreting the rainbow scale. Comparison 3 - Maps C and D: Q1: Which image do you think more accurately repre- sents changes in temperature? (Map C is the most accurate representation of the data because each change in color value on the scale maps evenly to changes in the data —degree of temperature change.) Q2: Why do you think the color scale in Map D is so different? (The scale for Map D has a break in the color from blue, to yellow, to orange around 27.8°C— the temperature that will sustain a hur- ricane. Thus, this color scale is purposely adjusted to emphasize sea surface temperatures that will sustain a hurricane. ) Comparison 1 - Maps A and B: Q1: Does one map show hotter sea surface temperatures than the other? Q2: Compare and contrast the two scales? Comparison 2 - Maps A and C: Q1: Are there any features that stand out in one and not the other? Q2: Which one do you think a color blind person could interpret? Comparison 3 - Maps C and D: Q1: Which image do you think more accurately represents changes in temperature? Q2: Why do you think the color scale in Map D is so different? Directions: Create your own color map. Color in the color scale with any colors or shades of colors you choose. Label the data ranges for each color. Ranges do not have to start at zero or be segmented evenly. Your challenge is to create a color scale that will accurately represent the size of the ozone hole. Color Scale (Dobson Units) Color by Number Worksheet NASA’s fleet of Earth observing satellites produce 1500 Terabytes of data each year, enough to fill 3000 laptops, each with a 500 GB hard drive. To help interpret this wealth of data, scientists rely on techniques to visualize information such as mapping data values to colors. Create your own color map using data from Aura’s OMI instrument of total ozone from October 2012. 292 306 318 329 338 347 352 361 368 367 361 356 342 330 320 306 302 320 327 339 354 368 378 389 397 389 381 367 359 342 331 316 304 322 330 345 361 376 395 406 411 408 397 388 376 358 341 326 311 323 341 349 366 385 404 412 424 423 423 413 396 378 359 340 315 326 331 356 362 381 397 402 401 407 415 415 406 390 369 348 315 325 340 348 359 368 363 352 357 347 366 399 409 397 376 357 320 329 331 332 342 340 304 285 279 283 307 353 395 403 383 362 324 326 327 328 327 297 247 224 216 222 254 306 375 408 386 358 322 328 326 325 304 253 210 187 177 186 219 287 359 402 388 364 321 325 321 330 288 232 195 179 169 180 216 280 357 400 376 352 305 316 325 325 289 242 208 194 196 217 247 301 368 386 370 347 305 314 317 318 300 259 236 232 236 257 291 342 374 372 356 332 293 305 311 315 310 289 283 279 290 314 336 359 360 353 339 320 279 292 308 313 312 310 306 311 322 331 345 343 346 332 324 308 280 289 296 304 309 311 314 314 323 330 334 329 330 317 307 297 292274 289 291 300 305 307 312 314 312 320 318 319 309 302 296
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved