Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Successful Community-Campus Partnerships for Service-Learning in Higher Education, Summaries of Literature

The principles of effective community-campus partnerships for service-learning in higher education. It emphasizes the importance of mutual trust, respect, communication, and shared goals, as well as the need to build on strengths and assets, balance power, and address needs. The document also provides tips for getting started in forming and developing such partnerships.

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

marcyn
marcyn 🇬🇧

4.3

(10)

13 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Successful Community-Campus Partnerships for Service-Learning in Higher Education and more Summaries Literature in PDF only on Docsity! Faculty Toolkit for Service-Learning in Higher Education The Principles of Partnership: The Foundation for the Community-Campus Partnership A growing body of literature focusing on collaboration and partnership building amply describes the challenges of developing successful partnerships (Flower, 1998; Lasker, 2000; Maurana, 2000). In 1998, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health board of directors and conference participants established “Principles for a Good Community- Campus Partnership.” Revised in 2006, these principles, or values promoted by these principles, have often been cited as the underlying force for success among many partnerships. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) Principles of Partnership 1. Partnerships form to serve a specific purpose and may take on new goals over time. 2. Partners have agreed upon mission, values, goals, measurable outcomes and accountability for the partnership. 3. The relationship between partners is characterized by mutual trust, respect, genuineness, and commitment. 4. The partnership builds upon identified strengths and assets, but also works to address needs and increase capacity of all partners. 5. The partnership balances power among partners and enables resources among partners to be shared. 6. Partners make clear and open communication an ongoing priority by striving to understand each other's needs and self-interests, and developing a common language. 7. Principles and processes for the partnership are established with the input and agreement of all partners, especially for decision-making and conflict resolution. 8. There is feedback among all stakeholders in the partnership, with the goal of continuously improving the partnership and its outcomes. 9. Partners share the benefits of the partnership's accomplishments. 10. Partnerships can dissolve and need to plan a process for closure. The power of a community-campus partnership can bring diverse groups of people together to identify new and better ways of thinking about building communities and strengthening higher education. By establishing the partnership on the principles Edited by Sarena D. Seifer and Kara Connors,Community-Campus Partnerships for Health 12 for Learn and Serve America’s National Service-Learning Clearinghouse Faculty Toolkit for Service-Learning in Higher Education The Principles of Partnership: The Foundation for the Community-Campus Partnership A growing body of literature focusing on collaboration and partnership building amply describes the challenges of developing successful partnerships (Flower, 1998; Lasker, 2000; Maurana, 2000). In 1998, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health board of directors and conference participants established “Principles for a Good Community- Campus Partnership.” Revised in 2006, these principles, or values promoted by these principles, have often been cited as the underlying force for success among many partnerships. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) Principles of Partnership 1. Partnerships form to serve a specific purpose and may take on new goals over time. 2. Partners have agreed upon mission, values, goals, measurable outcomes and accountability for the partnership. 3. The relationship between partners is characterized by mutual trust, respect, genuineness, and commitment. 4. The partnership builds upon identified strengths and assets, but also works to address needs and increase capacity of all partners. 5. The partnership balances power among partners and enables resources among partners to be shared. 6. Partners make clear and open communication an ongoing priority by striving to understand each other's needs and self-interests, and developing a common language. 7. Principles and processes for the partnership are established with the input and agreement of all partners, especially for decision-making and conflict resolution. 8. There is feedback among all stakeholders in the partnership, with the goal of continuously improving the partnership and its outcomes. 9. Partners share the benefits of the partnership's accomplishments. 10. Partnerships can dissolve and need to plan a process for closure. The power of a community-campus partnership can bring diverse groups of people together to identify new and better ways of thinking about building communities and strengthening higher education. By establishing the partnership on the principles Edited by Sarena D. Seifer and Kara Connors,Community-Campus Partnerships for Health 12 for Learn and Serve America’s National Service-Learning Clearinghouse Faculty Toolkit for Service-Learning in Higher Education presented above, the partnership is well-positioned to focus on the pre-planning and planning strategies necessary for the development of a service-learning course. These are also key principles that can encourage the institutionalization, growth, and sustainability of both the partnership and the service-learning curriculum. Integrating Community-Campus Partnerships for Health Principles of Partnership and Service-Learning Principles #1 and #2: Specific purpose and agreed upon mission, values, goals, measurable outcomes and accountability The first step towards agreement in these areas is to discover the questions each side has for the other. Institutional representatives may have questions as to the mission and strategies of the community partner, and the community organization may have questions regarding the institution’s curriculum building process and self-teaching opportunities. Once perspectives and agendas are better understood, a negotiation and prioritization process should be used to distill the areas of mutual agreement that can be used to piece together the beginnings of a working relationship. Principle #3: Mutual trust, respect, genuineness, and commitment These elements will become stronger over the passage of time, but it’s critical to highlight their importance at the very beginning stages of relationship building. The main message is that each side needs to offer up genuine respect for the other in terms of the value and importance of the resources, perspectives, knowledge, and time each side devotes to the partnership. Even though partners may look different, dress and speak differently, it’s important for both sides to reserve judgment and to maintain an open mind as to the motivations of the other party and the quality of what each side brings to the table. Principle #4: Build on strengths and assets, builds capacity, and also addresses needs Assessment can be productive, even at the beginnings of partnerships. The conversations that were held while discussing the first two principles should provide a base upon which to maximize each side’s assets while also determining areas of weakness or need that can be further developed through the partnership. Establishing a history of assessment will also pave the way for rigorous and meaningful evaluation as the partnership evolves. Further, until issues and needs are revealed, no true understanding or honest partnership will develop. Principle #5: Balance power and share resources Many institutions assume that their community partners hold limited power and that it’s necessary for the institutions to “build them up.” However, this is not always the case. Power dynamics must be carefully assessed and then, if necessary, methods of power redistribution should be considered. Once a more equitable balance of power is in place, resources can be more effectively shared. Partners should also be creative as to how resources are defined. Resources are not just financial, but can also include people, supplies, space, or knowledge. Appreciation and energy can also be seen as resources that can be and should be shared and celebrated by partners. Edited by Sarena D. Seifer and Kara Connors,Community-Campus Partnerships for Health 13 for Learn and Serve America’s National Service-Learning Clearinghouse
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved