Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

University of California Conflicts of Interest Policy for Private Research Sponsors, Exams of Technical Writing

The University of California's policy on disclosing and managing financial interests and conflicts of interest for Principal Investigators involved in research funded or supported by non-governmental entities. The policy includes procedures for preliminary reviews, substantive reviews, and reporting requirements.

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/04/2022

Diewertje9
Diewertje9 🇳🇱

5

(3)

175 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download University of California Conflicts of Interest Policy for Private Research Sponsors and more Exams Technical Writing in PDF only on Docsity! University of California – Policy COI 700 1 of 7 Disclosure of Financial Interests and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Private Sponsors of Research Contact: Deborah Motton Title: Executive Director, RPAC Email: Deborah.Motton@ucop.edu Phone: (510) 587-6053 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. POLICY SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 II. DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 1 III. POLICY TEXT ......................................................................................................... 3 IV. COMPLIANCE/RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................................... 6 V. PROCEDURES ....................................................................................................... 7 VI. RELATED INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 7 VII. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS .................................................................... 7 VIII. REVISION HISTORY .............................................................................................. 7 I. POLICY SUMMARY This Policy describes the review process for disclosures of financial interests made on the State of California financial disclosure form entitled, Statement of Economic Responsible Officer: Provost & EVP - Academic Affairs Responsible Office: AA - Academic Affairs Issuance Date: 10/23/2018 Effective Date: 10/23/2018 Last Review Date: 5/16/2022 Updated policy contact info Scope: This Policy applies to any research activity that is funded or supported by a non-governmental entity in whole or in part (a) through a contract or grant, (b) by a gift which is designated by the gift donor for a specific research project, or a specific Principal Investigator, or a laboratory or research program headed by a Principal Investigator, or (c) through in-kind support provided under a material transfer agreement (MTA). University of California – Policy COI 700 Disclosure of Financial Interests and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Private Sponsors of Research 2 of 7 Interests for Principal Investigators (Form 700-U).1 Unless otherwise excepted, the Form 700-U applies to any research activity that is funded or supported, in whole or in part, by a non-governmental entity (a) through a contract or grant, (b) by a gift which is designated by the gift donor for a specific research project, or a specific Principal Investigator, or a laboratory or research program headed by a Principal Investigator, or (c) through in-kind support provided under a material transfer agreement (MTA).The Policy sets forth the requirements for review of such disclosures by campuses, and other UC locations, and authorizes reviewers to make recommendations about how to manage, reduce, or eliminate conflicts of interest. II. DEFINITIONS A. Designated Campus Reviewer (DCR) A Designated Campus Reviewer (DCR), or the DCR’s designee, is responsible for conducting preliminary reviews of financial interests disclosed on Forms 700-U. Consistent with this Policy, a DCR may either perform a substantive review and make a recommendation about how possible conflicts of interest can be managed, reduced, or eliminated before the acceptance of the grant(s), contract(s), gift(s), or Material Transfer Agreement(s) (MTA) or refer the matter to the location’s Independent Substantive Review Committee (ISRC) for substantive review. A DCR is designated by the Chancellor of each UC campus, or in the case of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Director, or, in the case of the Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, the Vice President. B. Filing Officer A person or persons designated by the Chancellor of each UC campus, or in the case of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Director, or, in the case of the Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, the Vice President, to retain Forms 700-U submitted by Principal Investigators. The Filing Officer may be the DCR. C. Financial Interest As defined under the Fair Political Practices Regulations,2 a Financial Interest includes one or more of the following for the Principal Investigator, Principal Investigator’s spouse/registered domestic partner, and dependent children: 1. A business position with the sponsor or donor, such as a director, officer, partner, trustee, consultant, employee, or any other position of management. 2. Investment or equity (ownership) interest in the sponsor or donor worth $2,000 or more. 1 The Fair Political Practices Commission publishes and periodically updates the Statement of Economic Interests for Principal Investigators, also known as the Form 700-U. 2 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 18755. University of California – Policy COI 700 Disclosure of Financial Interests and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Private Sponsors of Research 5 of 7 When a Form 700-U indicates that a Financial Interest exists (a “positive disclosure”), a substantive review must be performed either by the ISRC or a DCR. Pursuant to this Policy, a DCR should conduct an initial assessment of each positive Form 700-U. Positive disclosures that meet the criteria in paragraph 1 below must be reviewed by the ISRC. For other positive disclosures, UC Locations have the discretion to develop and implement local procedures and practices to assign the substantive review responsibilities to either the ISRC or the DCR. 1. Criteria for Required ISRC Reviews If the DCR determines that any of the following circumstances exists, the ISRC shall perform a substantive review of the Form 700-U and related supplemental forms or information: • The PI has received income, gifts, loans, or travel reimbursement from the sponsor or donor that, alone or when aggregated, equals or exceeds $10,000 during the previous twelve months. • The PI holds an equity interest in the sponsor or donor that equals or exceeds $10,000. • The PI holds a position as director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or other position of management with the sponsor or donor. In circumstances where the ISRC has previously substantively reviewed and made a recommendation and receives a subsequent 700-U where (1) the disclosing Principal Investigator is the same, (2) the non-governmental sponsor with whom the PI has a financial interest is the same, and (3) the circumstances of the financial interest are substantially similar, then additional ISRC substantive review is not required. Instead, substantive review may be performed pursuant to local procedures and practices as described in paragraph 2 below. 2. ISRC Review Pursuant to Local Procedures and Practices For positive disclosures that do not meet the thresholds listed above in Section E.1, each UC Location may adopt local procedures and practices designating whether the substantive review of the research project should be conducted by the DCR or ISRC. Each UC location’s procedures and practices may provide the DCR the flexibility to seek substantive review by the ISRC even if the disclosed financial interests do not meet the criteria outlined in Section E.1. 3. Conduct of Reviews The DCR and/or ISRC may seek additional information or expertise from, and/or consult with, administrators, faculty, and others involved in the research and review process, as well as the Principal Investigators and department chairs to provide additional or supplemental information to make a fully informed recommendation. Individuals with competence in special areas may assist in the review process when expertise beyond, or in addition to, that available to the DCR or ISRC is needed. University of California – Policy COI 700 Disclosure of Financial Interests and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Private Sponsors of Research 6 of 7 DCRs or ISRCs should recommend to the Chancellor, Director, or Vice President of the UC Location as appropriate or their designees whether there are any conflicts of interest that must be managed, reduced, or eliminated before support for the research project can be accepted by the campus. The recommendation should include any special conditions or restrictions, if necessary, to manage, reduce, or eliminate identified conflicts of interest. 4. Timeline of Reviews Reviews must be completed and any identified conflicts of interest must be managed, reduced, or eliminated prior to the institution’s expenditure of contract, grant, or gift funds, or acceptance of MTAs associated with the financial disclosure. IV. COMPLIANCE/RESPONSIBILITIES A. Chancellors and the Chief Executive or Head of each UC Location Each UC Location is responsible for implementing this Policy locally and developing procedures for conducting independent substantive review consistent with this policy. Each Chancellor, the LBNL Director and the ANR Vice President (or a designee) is responsible for establishing the ISRC, and for designating a Filing Officer(s) and/or DCR to receive Forms 700-U, and store them for record keeping.5 Filing Officers and DCRs need not be the same person. Subject to the requirements of this Policy, each UC Location has the authority to determine how reviews shall be conducted including whether such reviews should be conducted by a DCR or by an ISRC. B. Designated Campus Reviewers (DCRs) and Independent Substantive Review Committees (ISRCs) DCRs and ISRCs, per local campus policies and procedures, are responsible for reviewing substantively the subject matter of the proposed research and assessing the Principal Investigator’s disclosed Financial Interest(s). In addition, they are responsible for communicating their assessment to the Chancellor, LBNL Director, or Vice President of ANR (or designee) along with a recommendation of whether support for research in the form of a contract, grant, gift, or MTA should be accepted and, if so, whether any modifications or conditions are required to manage identified conflicts of interest. DCRs, their designees, and ISRC members should possess the academic, professional, and administrative competence and expertise necessary to review the subject matter of the proposed research and to assess the University and other public interests involved. 5 Cal. Gov’t Code § 81009(e)(f). University of California – Policy COI 700 Disclosure of Financial Interests and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Private Sponsors of Research 7 of 7 C. Principal Investigators Principal Investigators are responsible for complying with this Policy, including the California Fair Political Practices Commission’s (FPPC) requirement to file Forms 700-U for research supported by non-governmental entities, APM-028, and the policies and/or procedures adopted by their UC Location to implement this Policy. V. PROCEDURES UC Locations should develop local procedures to implement this policy. VI. RELATED INFORMATION • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 18755. • Fair Political Practices Commission, California Form 700-U and Instructions on Filing a Form 700-U, available at http://www.fppc.ca.gov/search.html?q=Form+700U&currentTab=1 (last visited Mar. 26, 2018). • University of California, Guidelines for Disclosure and Review of Principal Investigator’s Financial Interest in Private Sponsors of Research, APM-028. VII. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Not applicable VIII. REVISION HISTORY May 16, 2022: Technical update – contact info October 23, 2018: This policy supersedes RPAC Guidance Memo 17-03 and is intended to establish the terms of that Guidance Memo as policy. This policy is replacing Policy on Disclosure of Financial Interest in Private Sponsors of Research (APM-028). Still in effect are the Guidelines for Disclosure and Review of Principal Investigator’s Financial Interest in Private Sponsors of Research (APM-028-10), which can be found in the Academic Personnel Manual. This Policy was also remediated to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0.
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved