Proportion Test of Moe's Violence towards Curly and Shemp - Prof. Robert B. Gardner, Exams of Statistics

Download Proportion Test of Moe's Violence towards Curly and Shemp - Prof. Robert B. Gardner and more Exams Statistics in PDF only on Docsity! Proportion Test Using Three Stooges Data Probability and Statistics (MATH 1530) Worksheet Gardner and Davidson, Spring 2009 Name: ______Solution______________________ The purpose of this worksheet is to have you use Minitab to perform a statistical test concerning proportion information you and your classmates have collected in the past. In Example S.18.2, we gave a quote from Joe Besser: This would lead us to believe that the proportion of violence by Moe to the third stooge was less when Joe Besser was in this role, than when Curly and Shemp were in the role of third stooge. In an earlier worksheet, you collected data from randomly selected Three Stooges films. The table below contains the data collected by your class. The first column (#) is the number of the film and not part of the data. The “Moe to Curly” column is the number of acts of violence by Moe to Curly and the “Moe to Larry” column is the number of acts of violence by Moe to Larry. Some of the data is the result of taking averages when multiple students randomly chose the same films. # Title Moe to Curly Moe to Larry 4 Three Little Pigskins 13 9 11 Three Little Beers 13 10 15 Disorder in the Court 14 5 18 Whoops I’m an Indian 4 1 19 Slippery Silks 16 10 21 Dizzy Doctors 13 5 25 Cash and Carry 4 2 26 Playing the Ponies 7 6 28 Termites of 1938 4 1 30 Tassels in the Air 8 4 33 Violent is the Word for Curly 11 8 44 You Nazty Spy 10 8 45 Rockin’ through the Rockies 16 12 46 A Plumbing We Will Go 4 2 54 Dutiful but Dumb 10 2 60 Lobo Boy Makes Good 3 2 67 They Stooge to Conga 7 4 74 Dizzy Pilots 10 3 “Moe and Larry - they were the best. I enjoyed every minute of it with them. In fact, to show you how wonderful they were, I never liked to be hit with anything. And Larry used to say to me ‘don’t worry Joe, I'll take it.’ Now that’s the kind of guys they were.” 85 Micro Phonies 6 2 93 Three Loan Wolves 7 12 97 Half-Wits Holiday 8 7 TOTAL 188 115 This data yields a proportion of Moe’s violence to the other stooges which is aimed at the third stooge (Curly) of: 62.0 115188 188   p  . Suppose that in the population of Moe-Larry-Joe films, the average proportion of violent acts by Moe to the other two stooges (Joe and Larry) is p = 0.43. For the first test, take (in words) as the null hypothesis “H0: Curly was the recipient of a proportion of Moe’s violence which is the same as the proportion of Moe’s violence aimed at Joe” and take as the alternate hypothesis “Ha: Curly was the recipient of a proportion of Moe’s violence which is more than the proportion of Moe’s violence aimed at Joe.” Quantitatively, you then have “H0: 43.0p ” and “Ha: 43.0p .” Use Minitab to run this test as follows. Click on the Stat tab, select Basic statistics, and 1- Proportion…. Click Summarized data and enter Number of trials as 303 (that is, 188 + 115), enter Number of events as 188. Under the Options menu, enter a Confidence level of 99.999, enter a Test proportion of 0.43, and set the Alternative to greater than. Click OK twice to process the computation. Copy the Minitab output and insert it here: Test and CI for One Proportion Test of p = 0.43 vs p > 0.43 99.999% Lower Exact Sample X N Sample p Bound P-Value 1 188 303 0.620462 0.496831 0.000 What is the p-value? The p-value is reported as 0.000, but this is due to round-off error. We only know that p < 0.0005. Do you reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis? If you reject it, what is your level of confidence? Include the “99.999% Lower Bound” in your discussion. We reject the null hypothesis with at least 1 – p = 1 - 0.0005 = 0.9995 = 99.95% confidence. In fact, the lower bound of a 99.999% confidence interval is about 0.49, and we know that the 99.999% confidence interval does not contain 0.43 and we can reject the null hypothesis with at least 99.999% confidence. In words, what does this result mean in terms of the violence by Moe towards the thirds stooge? This means that we are very confident (at least 99.999%) that the proportion of Moe’s violence towards the other two stooges which went to Curly is greater than the proportion of Moe’s violence towards the other two stooges which went to Joe. Now consider the data collected by your class for the films with Shemp as the third Stooge. The “Moe to Shemp” column is the number of acts of violence by Moe to Shemp and the “Moe to Larry”