Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Valid and Invalid Arguments - Foundations of Mathematics - Lecture Slides, Slides of Computer Programming

These lecture slides are very easy to understand and very helpful to built a concept about the foundation of mathmatics and use in computers.The key points discuss in these slides are:Valid and Invalid Arguments, Definition of Argument, Sequence of Statements, Premises and Conclusion, Examples of Arguments, Argument Form, Statement Forms, Validity of Argument Form, Modus Ponens, Rule of Contradiction

Typology: Slides

2012/2013
On special offer
30 Points
Discount

Limited-time offer


Uploaded on 04/27/2013

ashalata
ashalata 🇮🇳

3.8

(15)

112 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar
Discount

On special offer

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Valid and Invalid Arguments - Foundations of Mathematics - Lecture Slides and more Slides Computer Programming in PDF only on Docsity! 1 Valid and Invalid arguments Docsity.com 2 Definition of Argument • Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. • Statements 1 and 2 are called premises. • Statement 3 is called conclusion. Docsity.com 5 Validity of Argument Form • Argument form is valid means that for any substitution of statement variables, if the premises are true, then the conclusion is also true. • The example of previous slide is a valid argument form. Docsity.com 6 Checking the validity of an argument form 1) Construct truth table for the premises and the conclusion; 2) Find the rows in which all the premises are true (critical rows); 3) a. If in each critical row the conclusion is true then the argument form is valid; b. If there is a row in which conclusion is false then the argument form is invalid. Docsity.com 7 Example of valid argument form p and q; if p then q; q. premises conclusion Critical row ∴ p q p and q if p then q q T T T T T T F F F T F F F F Docsity.com 10 Valid Argument Forms • Disjunctive addition: p; p or q. • Conjunctive simplification: p and q; p. • Disjunctive Syllogism: p or q; ~q; p. • Hypothetical Syllogism: p q; q r; p r. ∴ ∴ ∴ → → → ∴ Docsity.com 11 Valid Argument Forms • Proof by division into cases: p or q p r q r r • Rule of contradiction: ~p c p ∴ → → → ∴ Docsity.com 12 A more complex deduction • Knights always tell the truth, and knaves always lie. • U says: None of us is a knight. V says: At least three of us are knights. W says: At most three of us are knights. X says: Exactly five of us are knights. Y says: Exactly two of us are knights. Z says: Exactly one of us is a knight.  Which are knights and which are knaves? Docsity.com
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved