Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Writ of Execution - Civil Procedure - Past Paper, Exams of Civil procedure

Main points of this exam paper are: Writ of Execution, Opposing Arguments of Defendant, Oklahoma Corporation, Advertised in Magazine, Shipped Products, Annual Gross Income, Writ of Execution, First and Second Lawsuits

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 03/21/2013

luucky
luucky 🇮🇳

4.5

(2)

91 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Writ of Execution - Civil Procedure - Past Paper and more Exams Civil procedure in PDF only on Docsity! Fall 1999 Midterm (Civil Procedure A) Civil Procedure A Fall Semester 1999 Mid-Term Examination Higgins Firearms, Inc. is an Oklahoma corporation; it is not registered in Arkansas; it has no Arkansas agent and no employees in Arkansas. It has never done business in Arkansas, owned land in Arkansas, or advertised in any magazine within Arkansas. It has not initiated any calls to people within Arkansas. However, it has shipped products to Arkansas via the mail and UPS, and derived $5000 a year in income from buyers in Arkansas (its annual gross income is $150,000). Two disputes have arisen over guns sold by Higgins. In an Oklahoma court Higgins won a judgment for $97,000 against one Thomas Smith in a dispute over 300 guns. Higgins brought that judgment to Eureka Springs, Arkansas and registered it under the Full Faith and Credit clause. (Tom Smith is a citizen of Arkansas). The Arkansas court issued a writ of execution to aid Higgins in collecting the judgment. The second dispute involves Norrell Arms Corp.(NAC), an Arkansas corporation located in Little Rock. It has sued Higgins in Little Rock, seeking either the 60 guns that it allegedly purchased or the `return` of its $18,500). None of the guns (in either lawsuit) are located in Arkansas. 36 of the 60 guns were also involved in the first lawsuit against Smith. (Note: The first and second lawsuits are otherwise unrelated). Higgins has been notified of the lawsuit by first class mail. The president received the notice. In response, the corporation has filed Rule 12(b)(2,5) motions in the Arkansas state court, arguing that the lawsuit against it be dismissed. The defendant corporation has relied heavily on cases and other authority, including such cases as Helicoptersos, Hanson, Worldwide. You represent NAC. You are standing in front of the Arkansas trial court judge in NAC v. Higgins. Make the best argument you can that the lawsuit has been properly brought and commenced. Be organized, creative, thorough. Use authority. Refute the opposing arguments of the defendant. Be an advocate. Note: This question is generally based on John Norrell Arms, Inc. v. Higgins, 332 Ark. 24, 962 S.W.2d 801 (1998).
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved