Living Standards During the Industrial Revolution: A Look at Wages and Height, Ejercicios de Historia Económica

¡Descarga Living Standards During the Industrial Revolution: A Look at Wages and Height y más Ejercicios en PDF de Historia Económica solo en Docsity! Economic history Did living standards improve during the Industrial Revolution? Rapid economic change had mixed e/ects for people Free exchange Sep 13th 2013 by C.W. AS WE showed in a previous blog post (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/08/economic-history-1) , Europe went through a period of astonishing growth after about 1760. The level of income that Europe has today could not have been reached without the Industrial Revolution. In fact, people often refer to two revolutions (though historians bicker about terminology). The First Industrial Revolution was about the introduction of machines, often powered with water or steam. It lasted from roughly 1760 to 1850. The Second Industrial Revolution used more advanced technologies, such as the internal combustion engine and electricity. It lasted from roughly 1850 to 1910. We know that the Industrial Revolution made Europe rich. But what was it like to live through it? Britain has the most complete historical records when it comes to this kind of thing, so this post will focus on that country. The question boils down to how you measure living standards. Historians are divided over what happened to wages during the Industrial Revolution. Everyone agrees that they did increase; the question is, when. Research focuses on real wages—wages that are adjusted for inXation. Getting data on wages is tricky. But accounting for inXation is even harder. (For example, workers often paid rent informally, meaning that there are few records around). And so it is unsurprising that researchers diZer in their estimations of real wages. Some, such as Peter Lindert and JeZrey Williamson, suggest that full-time earnings for British common labourers, adjusted for inXation, more than doubled in the seventy years after 1780. But Charles Feinstein argued that over the same period, British real wages only increased by around 30%. It’s a bit of an academic mess. Most people agree that after about 1840, real wages did better. Nicholas Crafts and Terence Mills shows that from 1840 to 1910, real wages more than doubled. Their dndings are mirrored by other researchers (see below right). Improvements may be due to technological innovation, which led to big increases in labour productivity and hence higher wages. Others reckon it is because the cost of living did not increase so fast. And the massive economic impact of the Napoleonic Wars—where, due to naval warfare, exporters suZered and imports were more expensive—gradually wore oZ. So, while the Industrial Revolution ultimately led to big increases in wealth, progress was unsteady. For much of the period, the average person was not reaping the benedts of economic change. So much for wages. Other measures of standard of living should be considered. There is increased enthusiasm for biological measures of standard of living, such as people’s height. Height is a useful measure for a number of reasons. It indicates how well someone is nourished. And people who do less manual labour, or who are less aficted by disease, are likely to be taller. A person’s height is not perfectly correlated with their standard of living—after all, Bill Gates is not a physical giant. But 20-40% of the diZerence in height between individuals is determined by environmental factors. And so at an aggregate level, height data are pretty helpful. Researchers dnd height data from diZerent places, including army archives; it is common practice to measure the stature of new recruits. Data can also be found in school records. Academics have even consulted records of people transported from England to penal colonies in Australia. Some research presents a rather alarming picture. Below is a graph which shows the height of English soldiers from 1730 to 1850—a period which captures the First Industrial Revolution. There are many diZerent explanations for height declines during this period. Some people (http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/dles/ClarkJPE2005.pdf) ’. Journal of Political Economy, 113(6), 1307- 1340. [Looks at real wages over a (very) long time-frame]. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Allen Lane. [Discussion of how economic growth does not necessarily lead to social progress]. Feinstein, C. H. (1998). ‘Pessimism perpetuated: real wages and the standard of living in Britain during and after the Industrial Revolution (http://www.jstor.org/stable/2566618) ’. Journal of Economic History, 58, 625-658. [Paper from an ex-economic history prof at Oxford. Also has some useful discussion on alternative measures of living standards]. Lindert, P. H., & Williamson, J. G. (1983). ‘English Workers’ Living Standards During the Industrial Revolution: A New Look (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468- 0289.1983.tb01221.x/abstract) ’. The Economic History Review, 36(1), 1-25. [According to some, such as Charles Feinstein, a “super-optimistic” assessment of living standards]. Hatton, T. J., & Bray, B. E. (2010). ‘Long run trends in the heights of European men, 19th– 20th centuries (http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~hatton/Tim_height_paper.pdf) ’. Economics & Human Biology, 8(3), 405-413. [Good overview of height trends in Europe during part of the Industrial Revolution]. Komlos, J, (1998) ‘Shrinking in a Growing Economy? The Mystery of Physical Stature during the Industrial Revolution’ (http://www.jstor.org/stable/2566624) , Journal of Economic History, 58, p. 779-802 [Good overview of how economic growth can inXuence height]. Nicholas, S., & Oxley, D. (1993). 'The living standards of women during the industrial revolution, 1795-1820 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468- 0289.1993.tb01359.x/abstract) '. The Economic History Review, 46(4), 723-749. [This work tries to address a major gap in the literature—women's heights]. Szreter, S., & Mooney, G. (1998). ‘Urbanization, mortality, and the standard of living debate: new estimates of the expectation of life at birth in nineteenth-century British cities (http://www.jstor.org/stable/2599693) ’. The Economic History Review, 51(1), 84-112. [Rather horrifying discussion of urban mortality during the Industrial Revolution]. Thompson, E. P. (1967). ‘Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism (http://libcom.org/dles/timeworkandindustrialcapitalism.pdf) ’. Past & Present, (38), 56-97. [Seminal paper on how capitalism inXuences people’s understanding of time. For a rebuttal of this, see the fascinating: Glennie, P., & Thrift, N. (2009). Shaping the Day: a History of timekeeping in England and Wales 1300-1800. Oxford University Press]. Voth, H. J. (1998). 'Time and work in eighteenth-century London (http://www.nukeld.ox.ac.uk/economics/history/paper21/21voth.pdf) '. Journal of Economic History, 58, 29-58. [Innovative paper which uses court records to work out how people’s working hours changed over time].