IELTS WRITING PRACTICE, Ejercicios de Inglés

¡Descarga IELTS WRITING PRACTICE y más Ejercicios en PDF de Inglés solo en Docsity! The data provides information about the ages of people that live in New Zealand during 2011 and 2012, comparing the change in percentage. Overall, it is evident that the most relevant change was in population over 65 years old, in contrast with the groups of people under 39 years old, which got the lowest percentage change. However, all the population obtained an average percentage of increasing. The percentage change of the group of people under 15 and the group between 15-39 years old, was -0,2%, showing that population decrease during this period. However, the next group that corresponds to people between 40-64 years old, had a considerably increase of 0,6%, being added 60.000 persons to the population in 2012. A striking feature was the highest percentage change on people over 65 years old. The number of people in 2012 almost duplicate the initial number in 2011, climbing from 500.000 to 900.000, which means that they got a 4% percentage change. At the present moment, some persons agree with keeping the previous architectonical style of the local area, in order to built new houses with similar characteristics as the older constructions. However, other people think that is better to choose their own style, requiring the local government to allow them to build new houses as their preferences. In my opinion, it depends on the historical value of the architecture in the area, where people have to respect the laws that keeps patrimonial styles. On the one hand, it is important to conserve the style of older houses when someone wants to build a new house in some specific area, such as the center of a city or a place that is conserved for its historical value. For example, the downtown in Madrid is an urban area with a lot of restrictions at the moment to build something new, due to the high value of the traditional architectonical style that has been conserved per decades. Moreover, in my opinion, the architecture in a place where buildings maintain similar characteristics, is more attractive and gives a special value to the city. On the other hand, new architectonical styles have been developed, and many people prefers to build their houses innovating with their own preferences. Currently, governments have destinated some areas of the city for those persons that build houses with different styles. For example, residence condominiums or villages are conceived where a part of land is sold and people could build their own house as they want, without any restriction. In conclusion, I think that people should be conscious of keep the historical value of traditional architectonical styles in some specific areas of the city. However, if some of us wants to innovate, there are different alternatives to build houses with our own style, without damaging the traditional architectonical language of a place. The diagram illustrates the process to get oil, which later will be used to produce perfume. Overall, in order to expect the oil, there are 10 stages with different ingredients and chemical reactions which produce this substance. The condenser and the separator are two machines implemented into this process. The first stage is harming water with fire, until it starts to evaporate. This vapor is transported by a tube, arriving in another container, where it passes through aromatic plants, obtaining steam plus Oil vapor. Then, this substance gets into a tube inside the condenser that has cold water at the bottom and hot water at the top. As a result, a mix of essential oil and water is produced, which is then transported to the separator where the Essential Oil is taken apart from the water, getting the final product that is hydronated with aromatic water on a thick tube. At the present moment, it is common to hear different opinions about the investment of public resources destinated to protect wildlife, especially wild animals and birds. Admittedly, it is important to spend money and attention in our environment, but governments should consider to have a balance between this and other aspects of society that have not been attended, like poverty or education. In regard to wild animals, some countries have spent many resources in saving wildlife, giving most of their time and attention to promote initiatives of ecologist groups, which have had outstanding results. For example, in my country, last year many people manifest the necessity of protecting dolphins and whales in the Amazonas, where the authorities decided to invest too much money on creating foundations which have the function to promote saving wild animals in that part of the country. However, this is a problem that has been solved during the last years, and I consider that is time to pay less attention to this groups and start to focus more on other social problems that we are living now. For this reason, as they attend to the nature, they should spend more resources on education and respond to the demands of people who do not have opportunities to work and suffer poverty. Meanwhile many people are sharing in social media the importance of protecting animals, others are passing through alarming situations like hungry or even death. In conclusion, governments have the obligation to take care of affected communities as much as they have done with animals, investing more attention and time to their own people.