Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad

Gender Roles & Economic Influence in Pre-Industrial Society: Women's Status & Contribution, Diapositivas de Cultura Inglesa

The role of women in pre-industrial and early industrial society through an economic lens. It discusses the legal status of married women, their inability to own separate property or enter into contracts, and their contributions to agriculture, cottage industries, and the formal labor force. The document also questions whether the emergence of class society brought about the separate spheres of the victorian period and if women's economic roles changed the lives of all women or just the middle class. The text also touches upon women's apprenticeships and their opportunities in skilled trades and professions.

Tipo: Diapositivas

2018/2019

Subido el 17/03/2019

DiMarCe98
DiMarCe98 🇪🇸

8 documentos

1 / 40

Toggle sidebar

Documentos relacionados


Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Gender Roles & Economic Influence in Pre-Industrial Society: Women's Status & Contribution y más Diapositivas en PDF de Cultura Inglesa solo en Docsity! Gender History Through an Economic Lens 1: Pre-Industrial and Early Industrial Society Married Women • “The position of the married woman resulted from the doctrine that her legal personality merged during marriage in that of her husband.” (J. H. Baker) • A wife was to her husband as a vassal was to a lord or baron. Gender and Historiography: Was this a Golden Age of Female Work? • Did the emergence of class society bring with it the separate spheres of the Victorian period? • Did this only change the lives of middle class women? • Other than farm labour, what sort of work did women do? • If women were key to domestic industries, but also did childcare and household work, what did men do? Women and Agriculture • Paid field work (HUGE gender gap: over 50%) • Livestock • Chickens (typically near the cottage) • Milkmaids (again, in a building near the cottage) • It’s less clear how often women worked as shepherds and cowherds. • “it is not clear that a woman’s industrial work was any more agreeable when directed by a husban, rather than a formal employer” (Amanda Vickery, 1993) Women apprentices One measure of sexism is society’s investment in human capital—long periods of training. • No women’s guilds (as in France). • Two kinds of apprenticeships: parish apprenticeships (cf Oliver Twist) and private apprenticships (to a master). • In which of the following trades do we find women apprentices? • Carpenters • Wheelwrights • Clockmakers. • Goldsmiths. • Gilders. • Engravers. • Wig makers. • Hairdressers. • Surgeons. • Dentists. • Blacksmiths. • Shoe-makers. • Weavers. • Gold wire drawers. • Silver wire drawers. Table 6.2. Southampton apprenticeship, 1609-1708 Male Female Other occupations Occupations Male Female Occupations Agricultural Other occupations (cont'd) Husbandry 2 5 Carpenter 7 2 Gardener 1 = Painter 2 = coa papi E] Butcher 5 1 Full 2 Baker 3 1 a = Currier 2 — Brewer 2 — 1 Ropemaker 8 0 nnholder 2 - Victualler 3 3 Ani = ! Fi Tobacco pipe 4 = isherman 7 — muker Vintner 2 = Wine cooper 2 _ Clothing Blockmaker 4 - Tailor 26 4 Tanner 2 — Glover 5 2 Farrier — 1 Weaver 8 2 Pointmaker 1 o Woolcomber 14 3 Castermaker 1 — Sergeweaver/ 31 9 Sawyer 1 — sayweaver Ironmonger = 1 Cordwainer 32 4 Labourer 1 4 Feltmaker 2 1 Widow =- 10 Clothier 13 1 Housewifery — 5 Cloth worker 5 É Total (367) 283 84 Cobbler/ 9 1 % of total 771 2,9 translator AS Kersiweaver 1 — o Button maker 1 2 Silk weaver 9 - Sempstress = 1 Other occupations Joymer 5 Blacksmith 7 1 8 Turner Cooper Goldsmith = Mariner 5 Freemason 5 Barber 1 Musician 3 Basket maker 3 Shipwright 5 Hellyer, 12 plumber Shearman — |rnre=na]]|=-."w] ] 92 Mean Male Female Length of 10.1 9.4 apprenticeship — (s=2.40)(5 => 2.42) Sample no. 42 43 Age at end 2.0 194 of term (s = 1.99)(s = 2.22) Sample no. 56 39 Premium £1.78 £1.96 (s = 1.29(s = 1.63; Sample no. 63 41 (1609-37) And after apprenticeship? • “....the majority of women in eighteenth-century Britain were part of an “economic partnership” in which the wife did not expect to be kept by her husband but contributed to the surpluis which allowed them to to purchase more appelaing goods and services in the market.” (Mokyr 2009) • More spending on women’s goods, less on beer. As the population and the economy grew, women found new opportunities... ....in domestic service. How about botiguers and botigueres? It helps that we have eighteenth- century yellow pages (this one, published by Elizabeth Raffald). Women in Trades in Manchester, Women Gender Percent 1 Midwife Women Shopkeepers la A 1788 er, cloth Demonstrably, when gentlemen dabbled in the marriage market they hoped to procure a bride as prudent and economical as she was charming and genteel. The manufacturer Edward Parker had second thoughts about his favoured damsel, a Miss Holt, whom he had visited three times at home and gallanted to a play, when he discovered her extravagance. By contrast, the self-made William Gossip found in his bride an unpaid housekeeper as dutiful and continent as any paragon of Protestant prescription: “for sure no woman of your fortune was ever less expensive.'2 A clear appreciation of female management skills is apparent in a host of masculine manuscripts. When John Parker pleaded with his unmarried daughter to return from one of her jaunts in 1749, his increasing reliance on her superior administrative powers was made explicit: Dr Child I shall be glad of yr Company at home for T know not how we goe on; for Peggy €£ Tom doe nothing but play the Foole togeather from morning to night €: she is very heedless, € [what] with workmen 8: serv[ants] this house as 1 now grow into years is quite above my hand to manage therefore [should] be glad if I could draw myself into a narrow[er] compass €: spend my remaining days in quiet éx ease ... Similarly, when Anne Stanhope was away at her sister's, her husband Walter Stanhope grew impatient for her return, pleading his helplessness: “ye house does not look right without you €: 1 am no way qualified for housekeeping.* In fact, a strict division of authority was eagerly embraced by most genteel husbands. Witness William Ramsden in 1770, complaining of overwork during his wife's lying in: T wish the next Week over that T may resign the Keys of my Office, for indeed most heartily am 1 tired of being both Mistress €: Master.” Indeed, cuckolded husbands who brought the common law action “criminal conversation” against their wives' lovers, often claimed additional financial compensation for the loss of their house manager.£ As the mistress of a household, the genteel bride tasted of administrative power and exuded quasi-professional pride. While betrothed in the summer of 1751, Miss Elizabeth Parker of Browsholme anticipated her household responsibilities with officious excitement. Her letters were peppered with questions about These new spaces were noted for theatricality. PHE SUPPLEMENTAL MAGAZINE So why did women’s labour force participation decline? 1. Enclosure To Humbleton T—Lelley Dale (extra-parochial) To Sproatley To Bilton Site of AN windmill To Elstronwick To Ñ= Burton Pldsea Y Lelley (detached) To Burstwick Open fields Common pastures Common meodows ZA EN yards 1000 —Preston metres 1000 A stakes
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved