TERCERA REVISION DEL ARTICULO DE INGLÉS, Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones de Idioma Inglés

¡Descarga TERCERA REVISION DEL ARTICULO DE INGLÉS y más Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity! “YEAR OF THE STRENGTHENING OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY” SAN JUAN BAUTISTA PRIVATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL OF HUMAN MEDICINE COURSE: INGLÉS EN SALUD STUDENT: NOLASCO VILLAGARAY, Yellka Zunmy TEACHER: SARAVIA PAZ SOLDAN, César Hernán CYCLE: V LIVING ROOM: MA ICA – PERÚ 2022 CRITIC PRESENTATION OF THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05499-1 “Presence of urinary symptoms in bacteremic urinary tract infection: a retrospective cohort study of Escherichia coli bacteremia” 1. Critical presentation of the title Guidelines for evaluating the degree The look is achieved YES DOUBTFUL NOT PUNCTUATION 2 0 1 1. It is clearly indicative of the content of the study (research problem, and main variables). 2 2. It is clear, easy to understand 2 3. Concise (≤ 15 words). (Gunning index). 2 4. Identify the keywords (descriptors) of the study 2 5. Use complete words (do not use abbreviations or acronyms) 2 6. Use an affirmative tone 2 7. It is grammatically correct (it is not a match). 2 8. Use simple language (does not use jargon). 2 9. Use clear and direct terms, without using gimmicky terms. 2 10. Uses essential words (does not use over-explanation). 2 Resultado: 20 a. The title contains 13 words in an affirmative tone b. Gunning states that it should not contain acronomys and in this case it does. c. There are no question marks, and the article is also consistent. 6. Critical presentation of the introduction Guidelines for evaluating the introduction The look is achieved YES DOUBTFUL NOT PUNCTUATION 2 0 1 1. Clearly presents the what and why of the investigation. 2 2. Capture the reader's attention from the introductory paragraph; “invites” the reader to continue reading. 2 3. The style is direct unambiguous. 1 4. The general topic (field of study) is initially presented and then proceed to the research problem. 1 5. The research problem is correctly identified and defined. 2 6. The background of the problem is presented without delay. 2 7. The rationale for why the problem was selected is made clear. Your research is warranted to fill an information gap. 2 8. The problem is important, it is current, it is susceptible to observation and measurement. 1 9. The investigation of the problem is feasible and measurable 2 10. The literature review of the introduction identifies what is currently known (based on what has been published) about the research problem. The what and why of the research is clearly identified. 2 11. The literature review is relevant and appropriate to the problem of the study. 2 12. The bibliographic review reflects information on the background of the problem, necessary to support the justification of the study 0 13. References cited in the text are well documented and current. 1 14. The relationship of the study problem with previous research is direct and clear. 2 15. The bibliographic review presents a range of experiences, theories, opinions with diverse and complementary points of view on the problem 2 16. The bibliographic review of the introduction identifies, from the literature, important information gaps on the problem. 0 17. The organization of the introductory bibliographic review is logical, according to categories and date of publication. 2 18. The bibliographic review is much more than a mere ordered list of citations: each reference has a justification, its place is decisive and, in no case, is it arbitrary. 2 19. The research is not isolated and is linked to existing theories. 2 20. The research describes an existing theoretical framework or formulates one of its own. 2 21. The theoretical framework is developed in a logical and understandable way. 2 22. The theoretical framework is useful to clarify concepts, relationships between them and with the subject studied. 2 23. The study selects the appropriate predictor variables and results. 0 24. The predictor and outcome variables are stated clearly, precisely and unequivocally. 2 25. The association between the chosen variables is described indicating their quality as predictor (independent) and result (dependent). 1 26. Extraneous (confounding) variables are recognized and their degree of control in the study is indicated. 0 27. The most important variables in the study are operationally defined, as are their degrees of condition. 2 28. The formulation of the objectives is appropriate to the research question (problem and its variables). 1 29. The objectives indicate unequivocally what it is that the researcher intends to do (observe, record and measure). 2 30. The descriptive objectives are few, concrete, measurable and feasible. 0 31. The objectives announce the subsequent achievement of specific expected, unambiguous, clear and precise results. 2 32. The objectives are presented in the affirmative, with transitive active verbs, in the infinitive tense, subject to a single interpretation 2 33. The wording of the objectives clearly differentiates the objectives of a descriptive nature from those of an analytical nature. 2 34. The hypotheses express in a clear, precise and concise way, a relationship (or difference) between two or more variables. 2 35. Hypotheses explain or predict that relationship or difference between two or more variables in terms of expected results. 1 36. The formulation of the hypotheses includes the study variables, the study population, and the predicted result (effect). 2 37. The predictor and outcome variables identified in the study hypotheses are operationally defined. 2 38. Each hypothesis of the study refers only to a relationship between two variables, for clarity of understanding (simple hypothesis). 2 39. The direction of the investigated relationship is unequivocally established in the wording of the hypothesis. 2 40. Each hypothesis is logically related to the research problem 2 41. The introduction ends with the formulation of the research question or objective. It adequately mentions the study population, the main variables (predictors and results) and the type of relationship/comparison between them. 2 Resultado: 65 a. The introduction es accurate and contains the correct number of paragraphs established ass appropriate. b. The appropriate verb tense is the present tense, and this article does comply with it. Abstract 3. The statistics of central tendency and those of dispersion of quantitative variables. They are cited statistics of qualitative variables with their 95% confidence intervals. 0 4. The normality test to be used is cited to analyze the Gaussianity of the continuous quantitative variables. 5. The tests are reasonably justified hypothesis testing statistics use for each of the main study objectives. 2 6. A model of multivariate analysis to check the possible joint influence of predictor variables on the variable main result. 1 Resultado: 6 a. The tests are reasonably justified hypothesis testing statistics use for each of the main study objectives. b. A model of multivariate analysis to check the possible joint influence of predictor variables on the variable main result. Guidelines for Evaluating Variables The look is achieved YES DOUBTFUL NOT PUNCTUATION 2 0 1 1. It is clearly stated what the predictor variables (exposure), result and the potential variables of confusion or modifiers 2 2. The main variables have a adequate conceptual definition (theoretical) and operational (scale of measurement, system classification, diagnostic criteria, etc.). 1 3. The measuring instruments of the main variables have validity and known and adequate reliability (cited studies that analyzed it); they have culturally adapted if versions 2 originals come from places with different languages or cultures (citing the studies that did). 4. Variable measurement techniques main ones are sufficiently described, are suitable and are the same for the groups. 1 Resultado: 6 a. The measuring instruments of the main variables have validity and known and adequate reliability (cited studies that analyzed it); they have culturally adapted if versions b. Variable measurement techniques main ones are sufficiently described, are suitable and are the same for the groups. Guidelines for Assessing Ethical Considerations The look is achieved YES DOUBTFUL NOT PUNCTUATION 2 0 1 1. The procedure is described for obtain informed consent. 2 2. There is evidence of the revision of the investigation by some council or committee ethics of the institution. 2 3. The researcher describes the possible potential risks of subjects study participants 1 4. There is evidence that the anonymity and confidentiality to study participants. 2 Resultado: 7 a. The researcher describes the posible potential risks of subjects study participants b. There is evidence that the anonymity and confidentiality to study participants. c. The procedure is described for obtain informed consent. Guidelines for evaluating data collection The look is achieved YES DOUBTFUL NOT PUNCTUATION 2 0 1 1. The collection instruments of the data are suitable for the design of the study. 0 2. Mentions the rationale for the selection of each instrument or measurement method 2 3. The validity and reliability of each measuring instrument. 0 4. The steps are clearly described in the data collection procedure. 2 5. The data collection procedure It's appropriate. 2 6. The choice and presentation of statistical analysis procedures is appropriate 2 7. The statistical procedures described in material and methods are those that are reflected in the results. There are no statistical tests not described or cited in material and methods 2 8. Statistical procedures are correctly applied for the type of data measured. 0 9. The statistical procedures used in each case are adequately and completely reported. 1 10. The data is analyzed in relation to the objectives of the study. 0 11. Each hypothesis is tested and the results are accurately reported. 1 12. The statistical analysis considers the level of measurement and the characteristics of each of the variables